[ad_1]
I refer to Mr. Ong Junkai's (Extreme Laws on Wildlife Protection May Affect Conservation, July 1) in which he appears to have misunderstood the point of this effort to change the laws for further protect wildlife. do not harbor "endangered charismatic" wildlife such as tigers and elephants, but we still have a rich biodiversity that deserves protection.
Every country has its challenges and wildlife protection efforts must address them. threat to Singapore's wildlife, but we must understand that Singapore is becoming a "city in a garden". Greening efforts have allowed wildlife (otters, civets, macaques and reptiles) to adapt to urban vegetation and to no longer be limited to nature reserves.
Education is essential and we must know
The Animal Research and Education Society has discovered several cases of wild animals injured or trapped, mainly because of the l & # 39; Ignorance and the use of traps made by themselves
.
Singapore's wildlife is threatened by unethical photographic practices, the provision of human food and nuisance complaints resulting in kidnapping and slaughter, poaching and poaching. in the garbage.
will not isolate our society from nature, but will make it better protected.
It is urgent to adopt an approach to "appreciate at a distance".
Finally, I believe that Mr. Ong confused wildlife protection with wildlife conservation.
Wildlife protection generally refers to the protection of all wild animals, for example, wild boars and macaques. The latter term is often used to describe the conservation efforts of more endangered wildlife
We must evolve toward a compassionate society towards all wild animals, indigenous or non-native, common or threatened, and adopt strategies for protect all animals. and seek human resources to manage their populations when needed. The amendment of this legislation will better protect wild animals in Singapore
Kalai Vanan Balakrishnan
Deputy Director General
Animal Concerns Research and Education Society
[ad_2]
Source link
