[ad_1]
"As a black general manager of a facial recognition software development company, I have a personal connection to technology, both culturally and socially," Brackeen said in an article on TechCrunch. Government oversight is an extraordinary invasion of the privacy of all citizens – and a slippery slope to lose control of our identities.
The Georgetown study found that facial recognition algorithms were 5 to 10% less accurate.
Policy Matters
Microsoft announced last month that it had made significant improvements for facial recognition "across skin tones" and genders
IBM announced that it was "unclear." he was launching a large-scale study to improve the understanding of bias. facial analysis. "
Although more accurate facial recognition is generally welcomed, civil liberties groups claim that specific political safeguards should be in place." In 2015, several consumer groups abandoned a government-sponsored initiative. privately to develop standards for the use of facial recognition, claiming that the process was unlikely to develop sufficient privacy protections.
Cato's Feeney says that a significant move would be to purge these databases. "
Jennifer Lynch, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the implications for police surveillance are significant.
" An inaccurate system will involve people for crimes that " they do not commit, Lynch said in a report earlier this year.
Lynch said that there are s unique risks of violation or misuse of these data, because "we"
According to Evan Selinger, professor of philosophy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, facial recognition is too dangerous for the forces of order
: "It is an ideal tool for oppressive surveillance," Selinger said. a blog post
"It threatens so much the forces of order that the problem can not be circumvented by imposing procedural safeguards."
[ad_2]
Source link
