Astronaut Chris Hadfield says that NASA could have gone on Mars in the 60s, but that she can not do it now

Photo Credit: NASA / Public Domain

The most fundamental understanding of this What does NASA do is the daily innovation. research on all things related to space. For strangers watching, the space agency is still slightly ahead of the curve, but according to veteran astronaut Chris Hadfield, where the curve begins, NASA is several years ahead. As for the race to Mars, Hadfield said that NASA could have sent travelers decades ago, but there is a good reason why they have not done it yet

. Insider. "The technology that led us to the moon and to the time I was a kid – this technology can take us to Mars." Plans to reach the Sun's fourth rock date back to the 1950s, but even when technology finally caught the dreams of engineers and researchers, there was a good reason not to go ahead. "The majority of astronauts we send to these missions would not do it," Hadfield said. "They would die."

This revelation comes as a departure from a recent statement that Hadfield made discuss the capabilities of NASA, SpaceX, and Blue Origin by Jeff Bezos to send people to Mars aboard the Space Launch System (SLS) , Big Falcon Rocket (BFR) and New Glenn respectively

The reason for Hadfield's pessimism is reduced to energy efficiency. Hadfield says that burning chemicals is one of the factors that makes space travel inefficient. That's why he does not think that companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin or even NASA will revolutionize the field if they continue to use the same ideas to propel their spaceship. . "Burning chemical rockets is equivalent to using a sailboat or pedal boat to try to travel around the world … I guess we'll never go to Mars with the engines that exist on any of these three rockets unless we really need it I do not think it's a practical way to send people to Mars because they're dangerous and it takes too much time, and this puts us at risk for a long time . "

The teams at SpaceX and Blue Origin obviously disagree, but Hadfield made very good points, and the risks have clearly slowed progress, otherwise we would already be with the Martians. Mars in the coming years are currently written in pencil, although the UAE is hoping for a space colony on the red planet in 2117.

That said, Hadfield thinks that there will be must be major developments before anyone can do it right, ie something that uses gravity and not fuels. "Someone must invent something that we have not thought about yet … -being that the work that is done with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the space station and the particle accelerator at CERN and elsewhere … will show us how we can That sounds weird, but we understood how exploit Electricity and what the electrons do, and it seemed crazy, and it revolutionized life and travel. "So who knows?"