MOM interviewed on the workplace abuse protocol



[ad_1]

Will Singapore have higher standards for dealing with workplace abuse and harassment?

Earlier this week, a Member asked Parliament if the Department of Manpower would update existing guidelines. This is in line with the focus on the issue, spurred by global movements such as #MeToo and #TimesUp, and the recent spike in headlines about workplace misconduct – including those involving Singapore bosses as well as international executives abroad. Countries like Australia have recently launched a landmark investigation into sexual harassment in the workplace.

Labor Minister Josephine Teo responded that MOM is already taking a multi-pronged approach to protecting employees from workplace harassment. POHA), the tripartite opinion on the management of workplace harassment and the tripartite standard on the handling of complaints, introduced in 2014, 2015 and 2017 respectively.

The last standard, although optional, provides employers with guidelines on how to deal with workplace harassment, as a recommendation to businesses to put in place appropriate mechanisms for the grievance.

encourage companies to clarify who will hear the calls and the length of the process. He also urges companies to train supervisors on managing employee feedback.

"Employers adopting this standard are committed to putting in place clear processes to address the grievances of their employees in order to ensure that they are being handled properly. The same processes apply to grievances regarding workplace harassment, "said Teo.

She added that to date, more than 630 employers, who collectively employ about 380,000 employees, have committed to complying with this standard

promptly report any incident to employers, MOM or TAFEP, or seek redress from the police

How did you handle a case of workplace harassment? Share your story below.

In the same genre:
Boss in hot water for alleged assault
Patron imprisoned for molest the job seeker at the interview
Singapore's world executor dismissed for misconduct

[19659019] [ad_2]
Source link