Tehreek-e-Insaf: Why is it difficult for Imran Khan to bring a new reflection on India?



[ad_1]

By Vivek Katju


An Election Observation Mission of the European Union (EU) concluded that the July 25 national elections in Pakistan were "credible" overall. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), although it is a bit short of a majority in the National Assembly, and its leader, Imran Khan, the country's next prime minister, will welcome this boost. This is especially true because the two traditionally powerful parties – the Pakistani Islamic League (Nawaz) or PML (N) and the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) which had ruled from 2008 to 2013 – rejected the result, complaining bitterly of massive rigging.

The Pakistani military and judiciary, as well as PTI, would be unhappy that the EU mission notes that the elections "took place in the context of allegations of interference in the electoral process by the military establishment and the role of the judiciary as a political actor ". He also noted that the cases against former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif who, along with his daughter and political heiress Maryam, were imprisoned for corruption, "reshaped the political environment before the elections".

The mission of the EU was polite in its observation. The fact is that between them, the army and the courts had decided that the Sharifs had to be defeated.

The army did not forgive Sharif for having demanded a decisive role in the establishment of Pakistan's security and foreign policy and to have first insisted on the trial of former President Pervez Musharraf for treason. The superior courts decided to cut off the judicial corners to oust him from the prime minister's president and then monitor his conviction for corruption charges.

Sharif and Maryam have returned bravely to Pakistan and to prison, while Musharraf is abroad, in collusion with the army, a fugitive from Pakistani justice. This is the fear of the army that no politician and no media have brought to light this obvious contrast.

So now, 22 years after founding the party, Imran Khan will lead the country's government. His party will also run the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, which he ruled from 2013. The PTI was unable to double PML (N) in the country's largest province, the Punjab, but it will probably form the government in association with other parties. Neither the army nor Khan can allow the Sharifs to continue to rule the Punjab because it will be a drag on their ambitions.

  Why it is difficult for Imran Khan to bring a new reflection on India "title =" Why it is difficult for Imran Khan to bring a new reflection on India " /> 
 
<figcaption/> </figure>
</p>
<p>  Khan's political success can hardly be considered authentic because he was assisted by the army. He may be popular but will not be the absolute leader of the country as was Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in his day, or even Sharif.
</p>
<p>  One day after the election, Khan went to the country. He stressed his commitment to building a Pakistan naya. He draws his inspiration from the Islamic welfare state established by the Prophet Muhammad in Medina.
</p>
<p>  Ironically, despite his hedonistic lifestyle in the past, he said he would flee the Prime Minister's home. He also promised to work to raise the poor and the weak. Populism is easy. The difficulty lies in translating these goals into practical reality. He gave no real indication of the policies through which he would recreate a Medina-style welfare state in a globalized 21st century.
</p>
<p>  In his speech, Khan is also interested in relations between India and Pakistan. He called for bilateral trade and economic cooperation, but put it in the context of resolving controversial bilateral issues, including "the central issue of J & K". Khan has therefore adhered to traditional Pakistani writing on bilateral relations.
</p>
<p>  Significantly, he did not focus on the issue of terrorism. Indeed, he has become more and more sympathetic to a conservative, if not fundamental, religious program. His third marriage, to his spiritual advisor, points in this direction as well. In these circumstances, it is hard to imagine that it will bring new approaches to Indo-Pakistan relations.
</p>
<p>  The army will also not agree to leave its traditional positions on India. Like Khan, the army wants a reestablishment of the global dialogue between the two countries, which will show it in a better light internationally. However, he does not want to give up the use of terror; it calibrates it according to its purpose.<br />
Khan's second wife, Reham Khan, in her controversial biography, which emphasizes many aspects of the personality and traits of her ex-husband, quotes him: "I am not someone who can be used or directed to do anything. " The army used it against Sharif in 2014 while he was leading a march to Islamabad for an investigation into the alleged rigging of the 2013 elections. After the army had actually passed on to Sharif that she could destabilize her government by Khan's agitations, she ordered Khan to cancel the dharna. He complied.
</p>
<p>  Now, as prime minister, if Khan wants to be his own man, in the field of foreign and security policies, the army will soon show him who the boss is.
</p>
<p>  (The author is a former ambassador The views are personal)<br />
</p>
</div>
<p><script></p>
<p>                      if (geolocation && geolocation! = 5) {
! function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s)
{if (f.fbq) returns; n = f.fbq = function () {n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply (n, arguments): n.queue.push (arguments)};
if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n; n.push = n; n.loaded =! 0; n.version = 2.0 & # 39 ;;
n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window, document, & quot; script & # 39;
& # 39; https: //connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js&#39;);
fbq (& # 39 ;, & # 39; 338698809636220 & # 39;);
fbq ("track", "Pageview");
}</p>
<p></script></pre>
</pre>
[ad_2]
<br /><a href=Source link