[ad_1]
The unique features of your face can allow you to unlock your new iPhone, access your bank account or even "smile to pay" for certain products and services.
The same technology, using algorithms generated by a facial scan, may allow the police to find a wanted person in a crowd or match the image of a person in custody to a database of known offenders.
Facial recognition took place last month. Shooting in a newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland, refused to cooperate with the police and could not be immediately identified with fingerprints.
"We would have had a lot more time to identify it and be able to push the investigation without this system," said Timothy Altomare, police chief of Anne Arundel's County [19659002] Facial recognition plays an increasing role in law enforcement, border security and other purposes in the United States and around the world. the merits of some uses of this biometric identification, the technology evokes fears of a state of "Big Brother" monitoring.
These studies show that facial recognition is not always accurate, especially for people of color
Facial recognition. Reuters
A 2016 study by Georgetown University revealed that one in two American adults, or 117 million people, is in facial recognition databases with few rules on the way these systems can be consulted
. The law enforcement forces will deploy facial recognition in "real time" through drones, cameras and surveillance cameras. "Police on patrol identify law-abiding Americans with body cameras at will," said Matthew Feeney, Emergency Specialist. technologies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
"This technology enhances of course but it's not as accurate as sci-fi movies would make you think."
Deployments & # 39; Aggressive & # 39; [19659002] China is at the forefront of facial recognition, using technology to fine traffickers and "shameful" jaywalkers, with at least one arrest of a criminal suspect.
Clare Garvie, lead author of Georgetown's 2016 stu dy, said that over the last two years, "facial recognition has been deployed more broadly and aggressively" in the United States, particularly for the border security and at least one international airport
. Police software has sparked a wave of protests from employees and activists who have called on the technology giant to move away from law enforcement.
Amazon is one of dozens of technology companies involved in facial recognition. Microsoft uses for example facial recognition for US border security, and the US state of Maryland uses Cognitec technology and the Japanese technology company NEC
Amazon maintains that it does not It does not monitor or provide any. It simply allows them to match the images to those of its databases.
Visitors experience facial recognition technology at the Face ++ booth at the China Security Public Expo in Shenzhen. Reuters
The tech giant also claims that his facial recognition system can help reunite lost or abducted children with their families and stop human trafficking
& # 39; Slippery slope & # 39;
should not be deployed by law enforcement because of the risk of errors and misuse.
This is an argument of Brian Brackeen, founder and CEO of Kairos facial recognition software developer.
Director of a software company developing facial recognition services, I have a personal connection to technology, both culturally and socially, "said Brackeen in a TechCrunch blog post [19659010]. the privacy of all citizens – and a slippery slope to losing control of our identities altogether. "
The Georgetown study found facial recognition algorithms were five to 10 by
Policy Questions
Microsoft announced last month that it had made significant improvements for facial recognition "through skin tones" and the sexes.
was in the process of launching a large-scale study "to improve understanding of biases in facial analysis." [19659002] Although more accurate facial recognition is generally welcomed, civil liberties groups say that specific political safeguards should be put in place
Consumer groups have abandoned a government-private initiative to develop norms and standards. Use of facial recognition, claiming that the process was unlikely to develop sufficient privacy protections.
Feeney's Cato said that a meaningful move would be "purging these databases from anyone". t currently incarcerated or wanted for violent crime. "
Jennifer Lynch, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the implications for police surveillance is inaccurate.
" An inaccurate system will involve people for crimes that they have not committed. Lynch said in a report earlier this year.
Lynch said that there are unique risks of violation or misuse of such data because "we"
According to Evan Selinger, professor of philosophy at the Institute of Technology from Rochester, facial recognition is too dangerous for law enforcement
: "It is an ideal tool for oppressive surveillance," Selinger said.
"It threatens the forces of law so much that the problem can not be circumvented by imposing procedural safeguards."
[ad_2]
Source link
