[ad_1]
In the opinion of the court of Bosch, the disclosure of documents does not threaten the financial harm nor should it worry about the fact that it will be charged with an offense criminal or a crime.
According to the Stuttgart County Court, a major automotive supplier, Bosch, has to issue internal documents regarding the Volkswagen (VW) emissions scandal. Bosch, according to the judges, wrongly referred to the right to refuse termination
In particular, it is the communication by e-mail between employees Bosch and VW and the legal tender of the seller Volkswagen.
Bosch is not part of the lawsuit against VW, the lawsuits of the group's investors are directed against the holding company of Porsche SE
and his management and VW complain that the financial markets were too late to inform the financial markets of the scandal that erupted September 2015. VW and Porsche SE, which has nothing to do with Porsche, refuse the claims of the applicants
Bosch provided Volkswagen with the basic version of the software used for the sake of extensive management of emission tests. In order to clarify who, how and when he knew things, the applicants demanded that Bosch publish internal documents. The supplier has so far refused.
According to the court of Bosch, disclosure of documents does not result in financial harm and must not be afraid of being charged with a criminal offense or a crime
The court also concluded that the supplier can not invoke contractual provisions relating to company secrecy and confidentiality of information. For this reason, there is no reason for Bosch's rejection.
The company has not yet waited for a written reasoning for the judgment, and then decides on the next procedure. However, he reserves the right to use legal remedies to protect his interests. VW declined to render a decision on the grounds that "Volkswagen is not a party to the proceedings".
A competent judge wants to start questioning a number of eminent witnesses from the auto industry since September. Among other things, Bosch Denkmer, who also invokes the right to refuse to denounce, is also the Bosnian leader Volkmar Denner
The same reasoning is rejected by the former VW chief Martin Winterkorn. It is not clear if the court will really accept these recitals
[ad_2]
Source link
