In the wife of the former director of the city of Humenné, Vaľová also spoke



[ad_1]

Anna Lopatova talks about discrimination and asks for the invalidation of the testimony.

HUMENNÉ. The trial of the former director and long-time teacher of the Maternity School of Štefánikova, Anna Lopatova, who judges Humenné for the nullity of the testimony and the violation of the principle of equal treatment, namely the discrimination , yielded.

At Monday's main hearing, they delivered the last speech.

The article continues under video advertising

Invalid denunciation and alleged discrimination

According to Anna Lopatova, her person should be discriminated against in 2012 at the end of her employment in 2015.

After an unsuccessful recruitment to the post of director at the end of 2014, the beginning of the following year became superfluous and was fired.

Although Lopat did not take an interest in various kindergartens, she did not get the teacher's place.

"I do not consider the position of director, but the place of work of the teacher," she said.

Counsel for the plaintiff, Martin Mikluš, pointed out that the dismissal was perceived as a direct consequence of the discrimination and that the defendant had, in his view, created a situation in which the applicant became superfluous.

Even after the Lupat detachment, Lopatova considers herself discriminatory on the part of the employer.

It is an unrecognized work accident, a written instruction, what to do during working hours, where to stay, when to eat and how to get into the business. creche.

Lopata takes all her action to get revenge on her husband in Energobyte and Humen Energy Society (HES).

The court has already decided

Lopata is therefore turned to the court.

Read also: The participants in the Humennom conflict went to the field. The former director is sitting with the city

The court of first instance ruled that the termination of the employment contract was invalid in September 2016 in favor of the applicant.

In the meantime, Prešov Regional Court of Appeal annulled the judgment and remitted the case to the District Court for a new procedure and a new decision. .

On the agreement of both parties, he joined two questions, one relating to the invalidity of the testimony and the other to the violation of the principle of equal treatment. anti-discrimination action.

The court heard the current head of school, chairman of the school board and head of the education department of the city office.

Vaľová: Vyfabulovaná a vymyslená

At the hearing on Monday, the mayor of Humenné, the mayor Jana Vaľová (Smer-SD), also denounced it.

The whole question of discrimination is, in his opinion, "fabricated and invented".

He does not like the case of the media and sees it as a "controlled process".

[ad_2]
Source link