[ad_1]
In addition to the perfect color, you'll enjoy OLED even in fast-changing content, whether it's sports or action games, and the ability to maximize the system's response to changes, the answer is faster for OLED screens than for LCD screens. (While the LCD is responding for 2 to 16 ms, the OLED is less than 0.01 ms). As a result, OLED displays reproduce perfectly smooth motion.
Are we afraid?
The success of OLEDs does not spare the competition from the always productive LCD. Of course, they are also improving their products recently, for example, by using nanoparticles (called quantum dots) in the composition of color filters. However, the basic principle of the LCD remains the same and we know the disadvantages. But the effort of these companies to "talk" about OLED technology is unimaginable, highlighting its so-called weaknesses. In particular residual image, also called "engraving". If a static theme such as a spreadsheet is left on a screen, a residual electrical charge may remain on the imaging elements, resulting in the presence of an outline, "l & # 39; 39 "spirit" theme, even when the image is reproduced. This phenomenon can occur on any screen, such as the LCD, but it is true that active screens (whether plasma or OLED) are more sensitive. And manufacturers of LCD receivers like to publish various "independent" tests to prove this problem. However, the case has a problem: to "burn", you have to use the TV in a non-standard way, such as a computer screen (display of several hours) or advertising space somewhere in the store . This is the reason why test teams who have to prove that they "shoot at the picture" make OLED screens a real ordeal. However, the current user is not progressing; The normal use of a TV, such as watching streaming videos, videos from different media (DVD, Blu-ray and HDD), is unlikely.
Attention to letters
And, rather, a sweet remark: LCD TV manufacturers do not leave a "dry thread" on OLED technology, but they name their news so that the name of a customer without education gives the "OLED". impression of being close to OLED screens. Whether it's QLED (Samsung, TCL) or ULED (Hisense), the "navigation" hit is more than just offered. But do not be deceived. Even in the new Monster coat, it's still an old LCD screen familiar with all the systemic diseases. Of course, no technical product is 100% perfect, and this is the case of OLED screens. However, it would be a great pleasure to be overwhelmed by the exaggeration of the so-called weak: the highest quality TV technology ever achieved. And it's OLED technology, which proves not only expert review and evaluation, but also the user experience. Last year alone, about 2 million OLEDs were sold worldwide (which is not insignificant because of rising prices), and this year is expected to grow in size. 39, about 50%. It's worth thinking: if the OLED was really as problematic as LCD manufacturers are trying to betray it, would that interest more and more people around the world?
– advertising message –
[ad_2]
Source link
