Parliamentary Debate on the United Nations Global Compact on Migration – Stanislav41



[ad_1]

Well, this dilemma is really long and dramatic – that is, convincingly and at the center of the attention of citizens, it arouses curiosity for a wide range of possible solutions and everything must be decided at the following the two-day parliamentary session to be held on Wednesday, 28 November only. the character of excellence. You know, the views of members of the same party are usually shared at each point of the meeting agenda, but it was not so easy and even though it was very diversified – the exceptions, excuses and doubts in their assessment were uttered out loud and finally addressing those who they then voted for our abstention at the last meeting in Marrakesh, which will take place on 10- 11. December, and we felt they were not as obvious as the self-confidence!

I am convinced that you all know the fundamental fact of the emergence of the global migration dilemma, which originated in the United Nations in 2017, when the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights foreign affairs was our top diplomat and foreign minister of our government, Miroslav Lajčák. the document was presented with conviction, even in truth and with a personal guarantee that it corresponds to our interests in every respect, and it has become something that convinced voters to be incredible that most national politicians with the exercise of decision making in government and parliament give a basket!

At first it was quiet, but in July, following the Euro-parliamentary meeting, the attitude of many MEPs was shocked and today, while the vote of our Parliament is already of more and more accurate, the reality is such that I have described it – most do not believe it! In Brussels, in July, it took the form of 516 votes in favor, 137 against, 43 abstentions and 37 deputies absent. It was a question of convincing confidence, but the local scene is indeed surprisingly different from that of a minority of Member States. The UN, which rejects the migration despite the fact that its history, faith and the present offer information in a totally different form, and I will bring you closer to the example of what I am today. however, in my eagerness and conviction that Lajčák and his ideas on migration have dethroned in the TA3 three CIS members. The speakers were mainly Hrnko and Paška, but also Bernáták, long before deciding on the fate of the pact on migration and were convincing – the reservations are still heard, as is the position of Prime Minister Pellegíni, who still believes that if the Slovak Republic does not have Marrakech his delegation Lajčák abdicates and he perceives it as very dramatic and unfavorable, but according to their assessment, his decision in Marakeš will not change anything !!! For them the victory and it's a clear profit! And even as a reminder, you also do not know who discovered it as a tactic – that is, do not go to Marrakech in any way and refuse to accept the Pact for the migrants by proclamation, in spite of the fact that all the deputies had voted during the vote in Brussels for its adoption Direction with the only exception … Well, this also confirms the fact that the president of Fico is once again convinced that the amateur with the attribute is irresponsible, and believe me, this can not be simplified, it is really important and it is resolved in the form of 39, irresponsibility, usurping the power of decision, it is a betrayal for us all …

Obviously, in the fields of the philosophy of humanity in the world, everything is an issue of importance and nothing can be done, the law on accreditation has made it even more available! The conflict in the Azov Sea between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, martial law promulgated by Poroshenko in Kiev and the Putinov order to move troops to the border and in the Veru, as well as an increased militarization of the Crimea are for us the problem near Ukraine and we are not at all in what at first sight seems like "a storm in a toaster of 39 "water" can really be a serious business, it's our destiny as a danger to our nation, and the whole earth no longer deserves …

[ad_2]
Source link