Rashi's electoral complaint comes to an end



[ad_1]

The electoral complaint approaches the judgment.

KOSICE. The plenary assembly of the Constitutional Court (RepublicS) of the Slovak Republic Wednesday in public hearing was conceded to decide on the election complaint of the unsuccessful candidate for the bailiff Richard Raši (Smer) of November 15, 2017 .

Read also: Constitutional Court pursues proceedings on Raši's electoral complaint

He asked her to declare the voters invalid, which would imply that they are new.

Corsair has published a feature article on Rashi 's complaint and an interview with lawyer Iva Rajtakova, who represents the elected bailiff Rastislav Trnka (independent), after more than a year of proceedings.

Ivetta Macejkova, President of the ÚS, said that this was due to the elimination of the obstacle for which the procedure had been interrupted.

In the course of the next proceeding, ÚS will continue the steps of the process to make a merit-based decision.

The article continues under video advertising

The arguments of the Judge-Rapporteur were insufficient

As Corsair indicated in the article, the plenary accepted a complaint from the former mayor of Kosharian and current deputy prime minister at the next hearing on 31 January 2018, during which he was interrupted at the same time.

Read also: The Constitutional Court supports extremely Rashi

Lajos Mészáros' rapporteur's proposal to refuse to comply with the legal filing requirements and to provide no evidence of electoral manipulation did not garner an overwhelming majority of votes. The United States is still dealing with the complaint.

According to the judge, the incompatibility in Zemplínska Široká, where Rashim failed to hold 88 votes on the voters list, did not affect the overall election result, the gap between he and Trnko being 875 votes.

Corsair revealed that he had to check the sum of the valid votes cast for him, but already in all districts of District no. 7 (Michalovce), Raši ÚS applied again by completing the complaint until 28 December 2017, one and a half months after the deadline for filing.

Even later, on January 12, 2018, he announced that he had filed a criminal complaint against an unknown author for the withdrawal of 88 votes.

At the same time, he added an analysis of anomalies in the election results, highlighting a much higher percentage of canceled ballots compared to the Slovak average, as well as the election of regional deputies in the region of Košice.

Read also: Lawyer: Rousi's complaint is worrying

On the expiry of the period completed by the analysis, the ontS pleaded in favor of the acceptance of the complaint for a continuation of the proceedings, even though, according to Meszáros, "it does not". there was no evidence or fact that could justify a doubt as to the accuracy of the election results in the constituency ".

The reason for the acceptance of the complaint is that Rashi's allegations of illegality are not only of a hypothetical nature, they are realistically possible "and that their demonstration could ultimately justify the conclusion of a claim. result other than what was stated ".

[ad_2]
Source link