[ad_1]
The Association recalls that the Constitutional Court (RS) closed its doors two years ago in which it characterized the charge as "indictable". access to the distribution system of unconstitutional.Nevertheless, the declaration of judicial power does not even, according to SAPI, convai ncu monopoly distribution companies to support a fair and transparent reform of the RES system and restore energy equity. However, it remains to be believed that the Ministry of the Economy and the URSO will prefer to defend the interests of the state against private interests and will continue to support the Slovak objectives to reach the share of the RES and all of them. energy market entities
SAPI pointed out that all regional distribution companies continue to defend the G component, despite the unconstitutional finding of the Constitutional Court which for two years, unconstitutionality of many producers of electricity. green energy, despite the fact that the decision of the AS takes into account the district courts. Producers of the money that they have illegally chosen from the distribution companies. The unconstitutionality of the G component was decided by the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic at a public hearing in Košice on 22 June 2016.
To date, more than 15 judicial decisions have been rendered, which give unanimously right to producers, informed the photovoltaic association. The amendment of the law on the promotion of SER and chained cogeneration by SAPI modifies the definition of the concept of access to the distribution system and introduces the obligation to conclude the disputed agreement on the 39, access and distribution. The amendment wants to firmly squeeze a controversial payment for access in order to create a dangerous precedent. On May 11, 2018, SAPI was already organizing a public protest against similar targeted efforts before the National Council of the RS,
"We have not hindered the debate on the eligibility of costs, despite serious reserves, expert and digital facts.We refuse to pay the liquidation costs for the installed capacity because we also pay the time that the plant does not produce anything and can not prove that the technical or technical use of the system can not not, if the plant does not produce what it transports? ", asks Veronika Galeková, SAPI.
0
Source link