[ad_1]
The MP who openly organizes the path says that he has no problem with the Russian occupation of Crimea.
A group of Slovak MEPs at the end of July on Russia annexed to Crimea
The organizer of the trip, the single MP Peter Marček claims that he travels to Crimea as a private person and do not need permission from the Ukrainian authorities because Crimea belongs to Russia
on one thing – violate the laws of Ukraine. In addition to having the right to prohibit entry into their territory, they may include in the list of Ukrainian sanctions a ban on doing business and exporting capital.
Counterfeiting Act
Crimea is not closed to visits abroad. If anyone wants to travel to the occupied peninsula and not break the laws, the Ukrainian Migration Office and the security authority must ask permission. For journalists, registration with the Ministry of Information is also valid.
If he gets a permit, Crimea enters the designated border crossings in the Kherson region, for example at Kalanchak or Capela
However, deputies opted for another variant – the Crimean fly in Moscow
in that they reside in Crimea with the Russian and non-Ukrainian authorities. Given that Slovakia does not recognize the annexation of Crimea, it should reasonably request the entry of the Ukrainian authorities. If they do not, they break the law. In principle, they enter illegally foreign territory, "says Charles Svoboda of the Institute of International Studies of the Charles University of Prague.
Accept the occupation
See also the Slovak expert on Ukraine and Russia, director of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association Alexander Duleba [19659002AtthesametimeherecallsthatthedeputiesaccepttheoccupationofCrimea
"Deputies are not individuals: a deputy is an elected representative of a political party, has a political mandate and his behavior is under the supervision of the public.
The Russians have married what is 39, they were, says Marcek
Marcek, who organizes the way, says openly that there is no problem with the annexation of Crimea
] "Russia has picked up just what it was. There was a referendum in which 99% of citizens agreed to go to Russia, "he answered the question of why the Ukrainian side did not ask permission
. announced a 97% stake, the Human Rights Council of Russia, after the vote, issued an estimate that 50 to 60% of voters voted for 30 to 50% of votes
In her report to the Moscow headquarters, she wrote that 34.2 people from Crimea participated in the referendum.
With whom he does not say
Marcek says he wants to look for the " objective truth "in Crimea, he plans to address people in the street, talk to the Crimean government, then report his findings to Slovakia, and other members also welcome, in his delegation, Marchek , as well as a publisher and a cameraman, as well as contractors But he did not want to say who he was.
"Why are they asking such questions now, they will give you their opinion when they come back, and for the moment, I'm afraid some will go after this massage," he said.
Asked how he would deal with the subsequent ban to enter Ukraine, Marcus said that he would be sorry. "But I will wait for a new government to ban the ban." automatically ", he said.
Individual actions
The visit of the parliamentarians would not forget Svoboda.He recalled that the deputies SPD Tomia Okamura and the Czech Communists also appeared in Crimea.Today , they banned entry into Ukraine
"These are rather individual actions of specific people, and this is also perceived by the authorities. The Foreign Ministry is still announcing: We have nothing to do with that, "he said.
After their return, these politicians generally describe how life in Crimea is transparent
"They repeat the classic mantras on the referendum and the will of the nation. Or they say that Majdan organized the CIA. And also that life in Crimea has vastly improved, and that in Crimea, someone loses or closes somewhere, it is not at all true. Whether they would go to Crimea or not, they would say the same thing, "he concluded.
