[ad_1]
In the scoring competition, Peter Sagan attempted the sixth historic triumph. He could have reached it for the last year, but prevented him from being disqualified in the fourth stage, when he said it was inevitable for Mark Cavendish in the final round. The firing of the repeated times slowed down several times, and finally, the UCI leadership finally acknowledged that Sagan did not go unpunished. Pre Sagana is the "old lady" of this year seventh in career
Zilina, 20, does not yet feel a loss in the points competition. When he came to Paris, he was always on the stage wearing a green jersey. That's why his goal this year is to win again and catch up with the record of six German triumphs Erik Zabel. However, the Tour de France is traditionally the biggest competitor and Sagan does not need high quality opponents
. The first is the Colombian Fernando Gaviria, from the Quick-Step Floors team, who is able to keep pace with the pure bobsleighers and the Slovak cyclist did not give a chance to California Around. In June, however, in the Around Switzerland event, he lost with Petrom in a direct confrontation. At the same time, South America handles very well the small hills.
Excellent perseverance in moderate climbs is also the winner of last year's Michael Matthews. The Australian married to Slovakia is known for its versatility, but it can be limited by the weaker ends in the case of massive trips.
In addition to these two men, they should not miss classics like Mark Cavendish, Alexander Kistel, John Degenkolb Universe Greg Van Avermaet
Scoring Competition – Rules
The scoring rules were adopted in 2015 thanks to several modifications. At the same time, they say that in the eight planar steps, the target points are divided by the 50-30-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-7-6-5-4- 3-2
In the sixth stage with Mur de Bretagne and in the ninth stage on the cubes, the elite fifteen points will be won by 30-25-22-19-17-15-13-11-9 -7-6-5-4-3-2.
The range 20-17-15-13-11-10-9-87-6-5-4-3-2-1 is applied in the mountain stages and in the time of individuals.
[ad_2]
Source link
