Some say that the idea of ​​a president's shrine town could help migrants stay in the United States

An idea launched by President Trump to send immigrants from the border into "sanctuary cities" to take their revenge on Democratic enemies might end up pleasing them, placing them in places where it is easier to root and stay in the country, according to an Associated Press report.

The plan would put thousands of immigrants in cities not only welcoming but also more likely to put off federal officials responsible for executing eviction orders. Many of these communities have more resources to help immigrants stay in the United States than in small towns. Some of the country's largest immigration defense groups are based in San Francisco, New York and Chicago. The disadvantage for immigrants would be a high cost of living in cities.

Syracuse University's Transactional Information Exchange Center announced this week that an analysis had revealed that immigrants in the sanctuary cities such as New York and Los Angeles Angeles were 20% less likely to be arrested in the community than in cities without such policies.

"Since immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than the US-born population and sanctuary jurisdictions are safer and more productive than non-sanctuary jurisdictions, the data do not welcome this proposition as a politically motivated cascade that seeks to play a political role in people's lives, "said San Francisco attorney George Gascon.


Trump is increasingly frustrated by the situation at the border, where tens of thousands of immigrant families cross each month, many to ask for asylum. His administration has repeatedly tried to stop the flow and has recently shaken the top ranks of the Department of Homeland Security.

The idea of ​​shipping immigrants to democratic fortresses has been considered twice in recent months, but the White House and the Department of Homeland Security said the plan had been rejected.

Nevertheless, Trump said Friday that he was still considering the idea.


"Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as stated, seriously thinking about the installation of illegal immigrants. in sanctuary cities only, "Trump told Twitter. He added that "the radical left still seems to have a policy of open borders, open arms – so that should make them very happy!"

The mayor of at least one of these sanctuary cities, Chicago, said she would welcome such an influx of immigrants. "We have people who come regularly to this city. We have an entire infrastructure built to ensure that their rights are protected while the city of Chicago, under its current administration, has allocated funds to various groups to assist asylum seekers and other people in the justice system. The elected mayor, Lori Lightfoot, told CNN on Friday: "I expect it to continue, if it is to develop, that kind of resources. . "

She added, "We are a sanctuary city, we have immigrants from all over the world who are based in Chicago, they will continue to do that, and we will continue to make sure that this is really the case. immigrants and we wish them to come to Chicago. "

The plan discussed by Trump would have financial, logistical and legal problems.

Transporting immigrants stopped at the border to large, distant cities would be expensive and expensive at a time when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is already exhausted, having released more than 125,000 immigrants into the country. have been waiting for their immigration court since December 21. They are currently being distributed mainly in border states.

ICE charter flights cost about $ 7,785 per hour of flight, according to the agency, and require several staff members, including a flight health professional. The agency also uses commercial flights. Making longer trips would increase the agency's responsibility, especially as many of the immigrants she cares for are families with young children.

And despite the attention paid to the liberation of immigrants in the streets of the sanctuary cities, the Trump administration actually has a lot of prison to detain the families. As of 11 April, the country's three detention centers for the detention of immigrant families were very limited, including a Pennsylvania center with only nine immigrants.

It is also difficult to know how long immigrants would stay in these cities as they are required to provide an address to the federal authorities – usually a family member – in order to be released.

"It's illogical," said Angela Chan, director of policy and senior counsel at the Asian Law Caucus Caucus. "It is alarming that they spend so much effort and so much time to engage in political theater."

The Trump administration has long repressed cities with sanctuary policies that generally prohibit local authorities from cooperating with the federal immigration police, often by refusing to detain people arrested for local offenses after the date of their release to the country. asks immigration officers. More than 100 local governments across the country have adopted various policies.

"New York City will always be the ultimate immigrant city, and the President's empty threats will not change anything," New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio said in a statement.

But Trump seemed ready to step up his fight against the cities, promising to "provide them with an unlimited number of immigrants from the border".

Joseph A. Wulfsohn of Fox News and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source link