[ad_1]
Let me say it out loud, okay? Apple is full of them. I’m referring to Apple’s claim that its Arm-based fanless MacBook Air is “faster than 98% of PC laptops.” Yes, you read that right: Apple officials have literally claimed that the new MacBook Air using Apple’s custom M1 chip is faster than 98% of all laptops sold this year.
Typically, when a business makes such a statement, it publishes a benchmark, performance test, or actual details of what it is basing that marketing claim on. This is to prevent lawyers from launching out of missile silos across the world.
Apple’s website reiterates this claim, stating: “M1 is faster than chips in 98% of laptops sold last year.” The site also includes a detailed memo which states: “Testing conducted by Apple in October 2020 on preproduction 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 chip and 16 GB of RAM. Performance measured using certain industry standard benchmarks. PC configurations based on publicly available sales data over the past 12 months. Performance tests are performed on specific computer systems and reflect approximate performance of the MacBook Pro. “
Apple is so full of it
So not only Apple do not say what tests he bases his claims on, he doesn’t even say where he gets comparable laptops from.
Does that mean the new fanless MacBook Air is faster than, say, Asus’ Ryzen 4000-based GeForce RTX 2060-based Zephyrus G14? Does that mean the MacBook Air is faster than Alienware’s Area 51M update?
The answer I’ll guess is “no”. Not at all. Is it faster than the miniLED based MSI Creator 17? Probably not either.
And on what is this claim of “performance” based? Processor performance? GPU performance? Performance under Windows? Is it using the same app on both platforms? Is it experiential? Does it work Red Dead Redemption II or Call of Duty: Cold War Black Ops? Is CyberLink PowerDirector running? Does it work Fortnite?
While I have no idea what Apple is relying on, I can tell you that I am 98% sure that any of the above listed laptops destroy the MacBook Air by doing one of the tasks I just mentioned. appoint.
When Apple makes its claims, I guess they are comparing the new M1 to Intel processors, ranging from Atom and Celeron N to Core i3 and above, all with integrated graphics. But by not defining the word “performance” it all becomes a pure marketing spin. And is it really fair to compare a $ 999 MacBook to a $ 150 MacBook? Because $ 150 computers are included in the 98% of laptops sold.
Maybe Apple should compare its own $ 150 MacBook Air to a $ 150 Chromebook or Windows laptop. Of course, that would mean that Apple would have to sell a product that most people can afford. I have no doubt the M1 will be impressive, but do I think it’s going to compare to 8 Ryzen 4000 performance cores or a GeForce RTX 2060? No.
Have dignity, Apple
But what really pisses me off is that there is simply no reason for Apple to reach such absurd levels to justify its new Arm-based M1 in the new MacBook Air, MacBook Pro 13, and MacMini. .
The M1 chip, built using TSMC’s most advanced 5nm process, appears to be a veritable feat of engineering feat one would expect from one of the richest for-profit companies in the world. history of mankind. It’ll just sing – just sing – for apps that are optimized for it. And, yes, there will indeed be similar apps where they are indeed faster than many Windows x86 laptops.
But there will also be loads of tasks that you can’t just perform on these Macs. And there will probably be cases where the performance could be too poor compared to an x86 laptop.
Now, if you like Macs and everything Apple has to offer, you should definitely consider newer Macs over older Intel-based Macs. I say this because I’m pretty sure buying an Intel-based Mac is like buying a ticket to stand on a desert island so you can say hello to Apple as it flies away in a party boat.
So, have some Apple dignity, and stop trolling just to grab attention and hopefully influence the 93 out of 100 people who prefer to buy Windows laptops over MacOS laptops every year.
[ad_2]
Source link