[ad_1]
WASHINGTON – Do not assume that the Democrat-led House is beginning an impeachment proceeding against President Donald Trump in the near future, despite the new details regarding Trump's actions, included in the long-awaited report of the United States. special advocate Robert Mueller.
The Democratic Party No. 2 in the House rejected the president's attempt to remove him after the report was released on Thursday.
"Based on what we have seen so far, there is no point in going ahead in impeachment," CNN Steny Hoyer, House Majority Leader, told D-Md. "The elections will be held in 18 months people will make a judgment".
Similarly, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, who would conduct any impeachment investigation, told the press that he was "too early to talk about it".
"It's a possibility, there are others," said Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. "We obviously need to get to the bottom of things and take the steps that seem necessary at that time."
New York representative Hakeem Jeffries, chairman of the Democratic Caucus and a member of the Judiciary Committee, told USA TODAY that the impeachment would be "premature", with Congress remaining "in the information gathering mode".
"As President Pelosi has indicated to proceed with the indictment, the case should be convincing, the evidence must be overwhelming and public opinion about the indictment should be bipartisan nature, "said Jeffries. "These conditions still do not exist."
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an influential voice among House progressives, said that there was no reason for Congress to waive its "constitutionally mandated investigative responsibility." ".
"Many people know that I do not take pleasure in discussing impeachment, I have not campaigned on it, and I rarely talk about it without invitation," she tweeted. "But the report puts it squarely on our doorstep."
In another tweet, she announced her intention to sign a resolution on the dismissal advanced by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.
Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi decided last month to stop any discussion of the impeachment by telling the Washington Post that Trump "was just not worth it".
In an interview with USA TODAY in March, she explained that the dismissal was a waste of time "unless the evidence is so conclusive that Republicans will understand."
"If not, it's a gift for the president, we stop the ball," she said.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., Congressional Assistant when the House began impeachment proceedings against President Richard Nixon and Congressman when President Bill Clinton was removed from office, said the impeachment was successful only if the public supported.
"In the Nixon case, there was significant obstruction and misconduct, and there was also a strong feeling in the country that action needed to be taken," said Lofgren, a member of the Judiciary Committee. "I do not think we're at this point, and we may never be."
Democrats are well aware of the risks of moving forward when dismissal does not receive sufficient public support. They observed what happened to the Republicans during the dismissal of Clinton. Clinton's popularity increased and Republicans lost seats in the next election.
But not all democrats were ready to totally dismiss the impeachment procedure.
The California representative, Eric Swalwell, a member of the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees who is also running for the presidency, was less quick to rule out the impeachment.
"No matter what happens, if Donald Trump is still there in November 2020, we should remove him from the polls, but I do not think we should remove the dismissal from the table," he said. CNN.
Noting a list of concerns about Trump's conduct, which were part of the 448-page Mueller report, Swalwell added that Trump's actions "do not meet the standard of conduct we want from a president." the United States".
The Connecticut representative, Jim Himes, who sits on the intelligence committee, said the report puts Pelosi in a "difficult position, because the Constitution requires Congress to consider this detailed behavior in the Mueller report."
"But you could waste a lot of time, energy and resources where the conclusion in the Senate is almost forgotten," he told USA TODAY.
Democrats pledged to thoroughly examine Mueller's report, including asking for underlying evidence and calling Mueller to testify.
"I think that after the structure of the report … it was probably written in order to provide Congress with a roadmap," Nadler said. "We must follow the evidence where this will lead."
Read or share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/18/mueller-report-steny-hoyer-says-impeaching-trump-nof-worthwhile/3513685002/
[ad_2]
Source link