Stephen Moore called it a parody, as women "do not feel free" to play sports with men

by



[ad_1]

Stephen Moore, economic commentator and former Trump campaign advisor, made these comments and similar comments in several columns reviewed by CNN's KFile and published on the National Review's conservative magazine's website in 2001, twice in 2002 and 2003.
In a 2000 column, Moore complained that his wife had voted for Democrats by writing, "Women are so malleable! It's no wonder that there is a gap." between the sexes. " In another column in 2000, Moore criticized female athletes advocating equal pay, saying they wanted "equal pay for lower work".

Moore, who later worked as a member of the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, was at the time president of the Club for Growth, a conservative political organization. He was a CNN contributor from 2017 until last month.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Stephen Moore has already criticized the word

The chronicles are attracting more and more attention, his earlier views and statements being the subject of close scrutiny in view of a contentious confirmation process at the Reserve Board of Governors. Federal. Trump said in March that he intended to nominate Moore for the position, but he has not yet been formally named.

The comments resurface as Trump tweeted Monday that his other choice to sit on the Fed's board, Herman Cain, had been withdrawn from the review following a re-examination of sexual harassment allegations that ended his 2012 presidential campaign. Cain denied the accusations and repeated on several occasions that he had no intention of evading consideration, but he had no way clear to get Senate approval after four Republican senators had announced that they would not vote for him.

In one of his 2002 columns, Moore suggested modifying the March Madness tournament to eliminate "non-American" aspects. The first rule proposed by Moore was "no women".

"Here is the rule change that I propose: more women referees, more presenters, more beer sellers, nothing female," he wrote in March 2002. "There is of course an exception to this rule. are allowed to participate, if and only if, they look like Bonnie Bernstein Bonnie knows nothing about basketball is absolutely irrelevant. "He later wrote that Bernstein, CBS sports journalist at the time should wear halter tops.

Previously, Moore had expressed disgust at a woman refereeing an NCAA game.

"How scandalous is this year, they have allowed a woman to play in an NCAA men's game, and the Liberals are celebrating this as a triumph for gender equality," said Moore. . "The NCAA has touted this as an example of their progressivity.I see it as an obscenity.Now is there any area of ​​life where men can take vacations for women? step? Women invited to stag parties? Women in combat? " Oh yes, they have already done so.) Why can not women send away women's games and men's men's games? I can not wait to see the first lady arguing with Bobby Knight. "

Four Republican senators declared that they would vote no. on Cain

Moore wrote that this was part of the "larger and more serious social problem in America", namely "the feminization of basketball in general". Moore added that he did not care about watching women's basketball and that he was upset during games broadcast on ESPN.

"And while I'm on the subject, here is another parody: in recreational games and recreational leagues these days, women now feel free to play with men – without being invited into almost every case, "added Moore. "It's no joy to dive on a girl, it does not matter if I can not calm down (except on the eight-foot baskets) If I could, I would not celebrate swimming on a named person Tina. "

Moore responded to complaints about his chronicle 13 days later, mocking sexism.

"Several readers (all women) phoned and emailed me complaining about my last column as" sexist "because I said that women should not be allowed to refer to men's gambling", Moore writes. Their answer was: "So why should men refer to women's games? "Look, as far as I'm concerned, women can use chimpanzees for their games, I hate women's basketball."
In another column in 2003, Moore again wrote that there should be "no women advertisers". And in 2001, Moore wrote, "Another problem is that CBS now has women advertisers and commentators, nothing is sacred?"

In another column published in 2000, Moore said that the real problem of inequality in sport was that women were earning more than "college-level", which, according to Moore, "could beat them easily."

"Tennis professionals do not really want equal pay for equal work, they want equal pay for less work, there is a very practical reason why Pete Sampras, for example, earns a lot more than Martina Hingis", Moore writes. "It's much, much better than her … The day Martina can return Pete's service is the day he should be paid what he does." "There is an injustice to tennis. , it is that women like Martina Hingis and Monica Seles earn millions of dollars a year, even though there are hundreds of men at the college level (assuming that their schools have not abandoned the sport) who could beat them easily. "

"Yet these men are doing nothing.Venus Williams is a multimillionaire, not in spite of the fact that she's a woman, but precisely because she's a woman," Moore continued. "She earns a much higher salary than an equally qualified man.Is not exactly the opposite of what we mean by pay equity?"

This story was updated to reflect Trump's announcement Monday afternoon that Cain was withdrawing from the exam.

[ad_2]

Source link