[ad_1]
Breaking News Emails
Receive last minute alerts and special reports. News and stories that matter, delivered in the morning on weekdays.
By Associated press
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court seems inclined to state that a 15-meter high cross that stands on public land in Maryland is constitutional but fears a radical decision.
On Wednesday, the High Court heard more than an hour of debate over the World War I memorial affair, sometimes called the "Peace Cross".
Conservative judges and at least two Liberal justices seemed to suggest that the almost 100-year-old memorial did not violate the First Amendment clause, which prohibits the government from favoring a religion over a religion. other.
The judges seemed inclined to find that the age of the monument and the special connection between World War I and World War I as a symbol associated with the war dead made it acceptable.
The monument stands on a grassy base in Bladensburg, Maryland, just outside Washington.
Some of the liberal judges have suggested in their cross-defense lawyers that they might adhere to a narrow ruling upholding his display, although they called the cross a major symbol of Christianity.
The biggest question could be whether there are enough votes to govern in a way that would allow governments to erect more religious symbols on public property.
Several conservative judges seemed skeptical of the broadest approach advocated by the American Legion's lawyer. The organization of veterans raised funds for the cross and completed it in 1925.
The "suitors" believe that its location on public land violates the First Amendment's settlement clause, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over others.
[ad_2]
Source link