[ad_1]
My old The hometown, Borlänge, has been named "Sweden's most populous city". It's scary. From now on, only a Facebook group is called "The architectural revolution". Nearly 7,000 people voted. This may not be completely representative. But still.
You are now reading one of yours free articles on GP.se
The news has been widely disseminated under local and national pressure.
I fundamentally share criticism of the Archbishop's criticism that "only square boxes are built", even though the middle people are like older classical buildings. The construction could probably be less agonizing and simple.
But when residential construction areas are abandoned by third parties, local patriotism wins. Each place has its identity. Our view of a city is inevitably governed by emotions and experiences.
Borlänge is a classic industrial city. In this way, it reminds us of Gothenburg. Many Borlängebor feel more comfortable when visiting Gothenburg than in our emotionally truncated capital.
The official deviations of the Borlänges "Gentiles" could be put on many old industrial cities. They often compete with the slightly finer preferences of their employees. Borlänge is nicer than Falun. Norrköping is considered more alive than Linköping. Gothenburg is more human than Stockholm.
A city is formed by its inhabitants and who seek it. Beautiful places often have a history of power and administration. They tend to attract money. But there is no blessing without ambiguity. They can easily be relegated to death at the expiration of creativity or when tourists and vacationers visit smaller cities. It is simply impossible to ignore the people who live in a place. A shabby city is not beautiful. Nor is it a blow for the inhabitants of big cities.
The uprising of architecture is pulling Therefore, stick in your foot by naming the most "full" cities of Sweden. There will inevitably be an attack on those who live there. Critics should devote all their energy to designing new buildings and rebuilding rather than squeak the modernist heritage. It is not realistic to carry out large-scale demolitions for aesthetic reasons.
All Swedish industrial cities are shaped by modernism. Sweden was rich in the 1960s and needed to build a lot of housing quickly. Norway managed to dominate the dominance of modernism because they were poorer and less controlled by central power.
In some cases, as in Gothenburg, this led to an explosion of cultural heritage, living environments and a cohesive city. Although everything is not worth preserving, it has torn too much. On the other hand, this was not the case in Borlänge, which was only a small village before the railway was laid out in the 1870s. Borlänges' wooden cages around the station can be compared to a city. from the wild west.
The lesson to be learned for the future is to avoid new large-scale construction projects. Whether for political, economic or architectural reasons. Sweden is currently facing a shortage of self-inflicted emergency housing. Do not panic. Review the rules. But demand urban working environments. Build on a small scale and include the citizens. For that to be beautiful, it must also be nice.
Source link
