[ad_1]
Almost 10 years ago, "Mrs. ES", as the name of the woman in the judgment, declared that the Prophet Muhammad, Muhammad, was addicted to pedophilia.
The bottom is well known, one of the many wives of Muhammad was Aisha. Their marriage was concluded at the age of 6, but "completed" at the age of 9 years. Tasks that many Muslims respect, although some claim that Aisha was considerably older.
– A 56 year old and a six year old? So-called, if not pedophile, said Ms ES at a seminar entitled "Basic Information on Islam".
Terrorist Party
It was in 2008 and 2009 that Ms ES organized her seminars on Islam for the politicians of the National High Freedom Party in Austria. His pedophile censorship against the prophet of Islam can be considered fair and true with the current Western approach, but the European Court of Justice believes that the woman in his reasoning has not taken consider the historical context.
Sentenced to Austria
The woman was fined by a court of first instance for her statement, accused of wounded religious feelings. Her case has since been examined by the Austrian judicial system until she appeals her to the European Court of Justice in Strasbourg, whose task is to ensure compliance with the European Convention. human rights.
The Court considers that in terms of freedom of expression, there is nothing wrong with it, it is free to criticize Islam as it has done. On the other hand, she crossed the border in terms of "protecting religious feelings" and preserving "religious peace in Austria", reports Deutsche Welle.
Prejudices caused
The Court itself writes that they have struck a balance between freedom of expression and the offending of religious feelings. They find that Ms. ES's statement, almost a decade ago, can not be considered an objective statement in the debate and that this statement was an attack on the prophet of Islam because "it could spark prejudices and threaten religious peace ". The European Court of Human Rights therefore thinks that the fine of 480 euros, which has already been sentenced, will be fixed.
Strong reactions
The verdict against the Austrian woman immediately triggered strong reactions throughout Europe. Today, voices are being heard to threaten freedom of expression. Others say that it is to blame at the EU level, with the risk of no longer criticizing religion.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a famous Islamist critic of Somali origin, became known as a liberal politician in the Netherlands before leaving for the United States after being threatened with death by the lives of Islamists.
– This was the most corrupt, abominable and barbaric judgment of our time, writes Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Twitter.
She thinks it's a major setback for freedom of expression.
– No wonder European citizens in Europe have lost confidence in institutions like this one.
Bad signal to the fanatic
In Sweden, Ann Heberlein, a moderate political woman, has reacted, even for criticizing Islam. On the pages of the guide, she writes that the judgment makes an extreme interpretation when freedom of religion is allowed to pass before freedom of speech.
"It is extremely serious, the judgment means that lay people have to adapt to the beliefs of people who believe.This sends totally false signals to religious fanatics," writes Ann Heberlein.
[ad_2]
Source link
