[ad_1]
Dear Thérèse, Two years ago, the British voted to regain control of their democracy. They would not finance the EU and they had been promised the right to establish their laws autonomously. Now the country is about to become a colony governed by Brussels.
Boris Johnson then motivated his departure as British Foreign Secretary in a letter to Prime Minister Theresa May. He could not represent a British negotiating delegation that, in his opinion, waved white flags instead of defending national self-government.
Johnson jumped on the government just hours after Brexit Minister David Davis did the same. The conflict concerns Britain's difficult choices: what autonomy should the country accept to trade freely with the EU?
One of the fundamental problems is that the European establishment is struggling to accept the exit of Britain. The President of the European Council Donald Tusk expressed on Twitter the wish that the departures of the British government be the end of the Brexit project (9/7).
EU officials are doing what they can to facilitate the exit. In no way do they want Brexit to benefit Great Britain and thus encourage more countries to choose the same route. What we see is therefore not a normal negotiation between two parties seeking mutual benefit, but a negotiation where one party wants to lose the other party.
If anyone in Brussels really thinks that it can stop a Brexit is not clear – Theresa May It is clear that the promise to British citizens for the referendum will take place. But even if it was an error to prevent Brexit. If the British people were skeptical of the EU before, there is nothing against what would happen if citizens felt that the EU was forcing them to enter the EU. Union by technical maneuvers.
The United Kingdom is one of the EU countries closest to Sweden if we look at their vote in the Council of Ministers. Commonly, countries have had confidence in global free trade and skepticism towards the growing bureaucracy. Outside of Britain, the EU will be increasingly dominated by political forces that do not believe in free markets, such as the President of France, whose current goal is to strengthen control IT companies. More rules in the same spirit as the new data protection regulation, GDPR, could put the hook for entrepreneurs.
Instead of taking action against this, Stefan Löfven seems to release the restrained pragmatic line that Sweden has held in the EU since entry in 1995. The Social Democrats have now announced that "no one is doing anything about it. they want an offensive European social policy. Last year, Löfven organized a summit in Göteborg to accelerate this work.
Perhaps the turnaround is an expression of the self-esteem of Swedish social democracy
Confident that other countries admire the Swedish model, Löfven hopes to export feminist government policy. d & # 39; Europe. When he discovers that Sweden is forced to adapt to the perceptions of the great nations, it is too late to come back. Britain, as a coercive force in the EU, had to continue to protect itself from the Swedish government.
Source link
