[ad_1]
The organizers of the Tour de France want to ban the start to the quadruple winner. The Sky Professional won the Great Loop three times in a row
No one should miss this year's Tour de France: British cyclist Chris Froome. (Photo: Imago)
For over nine months, British Velostar Chris Froome's positive doping test at Vuelta employed lawyers and doctors, and it seemed like the legal battle would not be over before the Tour de La France. But now comes the week before the big race of the year
Saturday, the Tour de France starts on the island of Noirmoutier. The organizer of the race, the Amaury Sport Organization (ASO), wants Froome to ban the start. The ASO relies on a paragraph of its regulations to exclude riders or teams, which is detrimental to the race's reputation. This brings back Sunday afternoon, the well-connected journalist Clément Gouillou of the French newspaper "Le Monde" accompanied by a colleague.
Unlike Froomes who claims to want to quickly move the process forward, the explanation is still waiting today. There is no time limit.
Gouillou had already revealed last December that Froome had been shown an excess of salbutamol asthma compound three months earlier at Vuelta. The positive test and the resulting doping procedure were first kept secret by the UCI World Cycling Federation. Froome, who had won the Vuelta, doubles the limit of 1000 nanograms per milliliter. This does not involve automatic locking, however, the driver must present a plausible explanation of the inflated value. Contrary to Froomes' claim to want to recover quickly from the process, the explanation is still awaited today. There is no time limit.
In the coming days, one has to wait for a legal tug of war, which could last until just before the start signal, and even then the facts will hardly be clarified. The crew of Froomes, the British Sky team, according to "The World" before the call of the National Olympic Committee of France against the exclusion. Sky's request to rescind the ASO's decision will be heard Tuesday at nine o'clock. Wednesday, the decision is expected. Both parties, the Froomes attorneys and the ASO lawyers, can then make an urgent request to the International Court of Justice in Lausanne.
"We are confident that Chris will lead the tour because we know that he has nothing
Froome wants to write the history of the sport.So he would win the Tour of France for the fifth time, it would be equal to Eddy Merckx, Bernard Hinault, Jacques Anquetil and Miguel Indurain Five victories were recorded: although Lance Armstrong triumphed seven times on the Tour de France, he was deprived of all his victories in doping.
The Froome team holds firm. "We are confident that Chris will do the trick because we know that he has done nothing wrong," said one Sky's spokesman at CyclingNews on Sunday.
The tone had become sharper in recent days. Five-time winner, Hinault, who has long worked for ASO as a driver, invited active cycling professionals to boycott the tour if Froome was to start. "He does not belong to the squad," Hinaul said. Heaven responded fiercely, calling the Frenchman's statements "irresponsible" and himself "misinformed". Sky coach Tim Kerrison also said that media criticism compromises driver safety.
ASO's decision to exclude Froome is not perpetuated. This shows a precedent of the year 2009. At that time, the organizer of the tour wanted to prohibit the departure of the Belgian Tom Boonen because of the consumption of cocaine. The ASO was then submitted to the National Olympic Committee of France. Boonen, who had not snored the drug on a hair test, was allowed to drive.
A year earlier, after several cases of doping, the ASO had unloaded the entire Astana team. This decision made it impossible for Spanish Alberto Contador to defend the title.
The fact that the doping procedure against Froome has dragged on for so long has also prompted the UCI World Cycling Federation to explain it. Their chairman David Lappartient has repeatedly stated that the case was unusually complex. It was important to defend the rights of the driver. Froome has not received any special treatment. As early as January, Lappartient did an interview with the NZZ to see what great British legal effort is operating: "Froome is not a driver like the others. He has more money. He can bring together more experts who express it in his mind. He may submit more exculpatory material. "
Meanwhile, records rose to 1,500 pages.The situation has angered Christian Prudhomme, boss of ASO.He fears that the discussions on Froome will overshadow the Tour de France during three weeks. "It is terrible that the authorities could not solve the problem before the start of the most important race of the year," said Prudhomme Friday at the station "Europe 1".
Nevertheless, Prudhomme's advance is a surprise.More recently, the French had hinted that he would let Froome go, as long as it would not be blocked by the UCI. , it's clear: Prudhomme exposes himself to the risk of a legal defeat.
The relationship between him and the most successful team in recent years, Team Sky, will be difficult to calm, whatever the result.]
[ad_2]
Source link
