[ad_1]
The World Cycling Federation puts an end to doping procedures against the winner of the Tour de France four times. The captain of the British Sky team is allowed to defend his Saturday title at the most important race of the year.
The message broadcast Monday by the UCI International Cycling Federation on behalf of Chris Froome is eight paragraphs long and contains 3025 characters. It's pretty big. But she does not answer the crucial question. The excessive value of Froome salbutamol is no longer considered a "positive finding" after the 18th stage of the 2017 Spain Tour.
Five days before the start of the Tour de France 2018, the # The UCI lost surprisingly acquitted. This also invalidates the organizer's attempt to exclude the British from the race because of his procedure. Christian Prudhomme, the boss of the Amaury Sport Organization, said immediately after the UCI decision that Froome should now be competing. Only the day before, we knew that Prudhomme wanted to prevent the defending champion's departure.
The 33-year-old will attempt from July 7th to win the Tour de France for the fifth time. He would also complete a rare double: Froome had already won the second most important round, the Giro d'Italia, in May. "It's an important time for cycling," Froome said on Monday about his acquittal. He had never doubted that the case would be closed because he knew that he had done nothing wrong. Froome said that he was suffering from asthma since childhood. He therefore inhaled salbutamol within the allowed limits
Froome presented his reasons on June 4, 2018 for the reasons why he exceeded the limit in September 2017. It was an extensive record, strewn with pills. studies. On June 28, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) told the UCI that it would agree that the sample would not be considered a "positive finding". The UCI stopped the procedure in a few days. The decision is based on expert advice, Wada's recommendation and a full assessment of the facts, said the World Cycling Federation.
Salbutamol can be consumed at a limited dose. A concentration of more than 1000 nanograms per milliliter of urine triggers a procedure in which the affected athlete has to explain. Froome has doubled the limit. The fact that the value was later reduced due to dehydration can not fully explain the discovery. The two Italian cyclists Diego Ulissi and Alessandro Petacchi were once banned, although their levels of salbutamol were lower. These two precedents alone could have made the justification for the Froome judgment of the UCI more transparent.
Source link