[ad_1]
The case is politically proven: three SVP politicians went to Bellinzona on Wednesday: cantonal councilor Hermann Lei (TG), cantonal councilor Claudio Schmid (ZH) and former national councilor Christoph Mörgeli (ZH),
The main character enters Chamber I of the Federal Criminal Court without a lawyer, he has quarreled with his (former) defense lawyer. In his sentences resonates bitterness, DerBund.ch/Newsnet, formerly referred to as "Auditor of the Nation", is in early involuntary retirement. Daniel Senn was at the top in his field: as a member of the auditor's office KPMG . He was called by the Swiss National Bank when, in 2012, it was to examine stock exchange transactions in the case of President Philipp Hildebrand. And he had been called when, in 2003, he had been on the verge of liquidating the bank of today 's bankrupt Oskar Holenweger.
"Project Sunshine"
But now Senn is under indictment. Partner status at KPMG has long been historic. The federal prosecutor's office asks the court to pay a fine of 117,000 francs and a fine of 7,000 francs. Senn would have used his knowledge as an insider to speculate on the stock market.
The story behind it is seven years back. In 2011, Senn directed KPMG's mandate to private bank Julius Baer. The bank has postponed its buyback plans; The management had kept an eye on Bank Sarasin. In September, Senn bought 4,000 Sarasin shares for around 100,000 francs. A few weeks later, takeover plans came to the public – and Sarasin's share went up. According to the prosecutor Cédric Remund, who did not appear personally in court, Senn earned a book profit of 30,000 francs
According to the indictment, Senn should have known as auditor the Bear Plan, under the code name "Project Sunshine". Attorney Remund provides two arguments: There were bear-minutes of summer 2011, in which an acquisition was mentioned. These were known to Senn. And there was – just a day before Senn bought the shares of Sarasin – a meeting of Julius Baer's people with Finma. At the time, Bär informed regulators that it foresaw a "major takeover." At the table: Auditor Senn.
"I told you the truth, so help me God, I know that it does not help, but I say it all the same." Daniel Senn, accused
In addition, the federal prosecutor's office questioned KPMG partner Senn, who said that it shines that the "biggest catch" meant Sarasin.
Senn asks the acquittal
This representation rejects Senn. He demands an acquittal. He was not aware of the redemption plan until September 26, 2011, a few days after buying the shares. The protocols were sent to KPMG in October. And at the Finma meeting, the name of Sarasin simply had not fallen. He bought the shares because they were dumped. There is another reason for the indictment: "The whole thing was triggered by a Mr Mörgeli campaign."
Christoph Mörgeli is sitting in the court press room right now, taking notes. The SVP politician is now working as a reporter for "World Week". He has written several articles about Senn, and he's the one who attacked him for the first time in his 2012 column titled "Strange Revision, Strange Auditor."
"I had insider information"
From Mörgeli's point of view, it is not about a campaign, but of An investigation of maladministration: "I had privileged information about the fact that Mr. Senn exchanged shares in Sarasin. he says. Mörgeli saw parallels to the Hildebrand affair – in the case of the SNB president too, insider allegations were made about transactions on Sarasin accounts. The connection to Hildebrand also explains the presence of politicians SVP Schmid and Lei; both were in the heat of the moment when the SNB president's exchange contracts, very unpopular in circles, became public
Ironically, Senn had been excited in the case of Hildebrand, says Mörgeli. Senn, who traded to Sarasin. Senn, who played a very questionable role in Holenweger's case. After his article on "World Week", Mörgeli wrote a letter to the Control Authority. At the end of January 2014, the Senn authority withdrew the approval as the auditor and reported it to the federal prosecutor.
More Roche and Valiant
The withdrawal of license ended with a compromise before the Federal Administrative Court. some time on his license. The criminal law has reduced the allegations, perhaps because of prescription; At first it was said that Senn would also have had to deal with Roche's options and Valiant bank papers as insiders.
There is no question in court. It is only about Sarasin and a violation of the revision rules. Shortly before noon, at the end of the negotiation, Senn should have one last word. He stands at the lectern, repeats his points – and adds, "I told you the truth, so help me God. I know it does not help, but I say it anyway. "
The court wants to announce its verdict on August 9.
(Tages-Anzeiger)
Created: 25.07.2018, 21:31
Source link
