[ad_1]
Postauto released about 100 million Swiss francs in taxes between 2007 and 2015. The money was used, among other things, to fill holes in the deficit sector in France and to finance the leasing of goods. bus operation in Liechtenstein (Blick reported). Between 2006 and 2011, just under 54 million went to France for this purpose, 17 million in Liechtenstein.
This is the same amount that PostBus Switzerland had already obtained from the Confederation, cantons and municipalities for excessive subsidies. Experts at the Kellerhals Carrard law firm, who investigated the postbus scandal for the Post Office, came to this conclusion: "The PostBus cash flows at the head office come from profit extraction. … largely coincide with cash flows to France and Liechtenstein, "he says in the survey report.
Post confirms changes in profits
The whole thing went as follows: PostBus Switzerland transferred the collapsed profits to the parent company Post. As licenses for the use of the "mark" Postbus for example. From the parent company, the money was then paid to the foreign subsidiary PostBus France and PostBus Liechtenstein
Happige blame, which examined the item "in detail" in recent weeks. "The clarifications confirm that Postauto paid hidden profit distributions from 2007 to 2012 to parent company Post, for which there was no justification," the press release said. "It also shows that over the years, PostBus France and Postauto Liechtenstein have not been overwhelmed by all services."
Foreign affairs were not profitable
What the post office also admits: this was counterbalanced by the foreign affairs deficit the public and the federal government. "If the costs had been allocated directly at the expense of foreign companies, the positive EBIT would at least have arrived at a later date, at least in France." For Postauto Liechtenstein, in these circumstances, it would not have been possible has had positive EBIT in recent years, "explains the Post.Means in German: PostBus France would have later made profit, PostBus Liechtenstein ever
PostBus now also from Liechtenstein?
The Business Review Commission (GPK) of the Council of States does not provide enough information on the postbus scandal.It requests additional information from those responsible.
The relevant subcommittee decided today to send a series of questions in writing to the Council of the Minister of Posts and Posts, Doris Leuthard (55) .Following the publication of the Postauto investigation report, the GPK had consulted the main parties taking antes: Doris Leuthard, Urs Schwaller (60), Serge Gaillard (63), director of postal finance, and the law firm Kellerhals Carrard, who investigated the accident of the postal bus
The Traffic Commission does not want to be in charge
The Traffic Transport Commission (KVF) also addressed today the postbus accident. Once again, Leuthard and Schwaller had to attack. Nicoletta della Valle, director of the Federal Office of Police (Fedpol), was also heard. FEPOL conducts administrative criminal proceedings in PostBus Bschiss
However, the KVF does not want to comment on their impressions: the clarification of responsibilities lies with the Parliament's Business Review Boards. (sf / sda)
La Poste notes that the Group's total liquidity has always been sufficiently high to finance its activities abroad, even without excessive compensation. Only: According to the experts, the 1972 Free Trade Agreement prohibited the parent company from subsidizing the foreign company. The legal dispute involving PostBus France, which recently led to a settlement, also addressed this issue.
Swiss Post has taken steps to prevent such events from happening again and is currently reviewing its future engagement in Liechtenstein. La Poste has already decided to withdraw from France
Published 03.07.2018 | Updated at 15:20
[ad_2]
Source link
