Sony RX100 VI and Panasonic TZ202 in a duel (part 1) | News | dkamera.de

[ad_1]

Part 1 of 3: Travel zoom cameras with 1.0 inch sensor and 4K video recording

On the left you can see the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI, on the right the Panasonic Lumix DC -TZ202. Superzoom lenses, also known as zoom travel cameras, have been one of the most popular models in the compact class for years. Thanks to the large focal lengths, these can be used for many purposes. However, the quality of the image remains partly on the track, small sensors quickly bring a significant noise. Both models want to do better in our comparison, here, image converters with significantly larger dimensions are used. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202 have the following test:

You can access our two reports at one test via the following links:
Sony Cyber-shot DSC -RX100 VI
Review of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202

Differences of the decision-making candidates at the time of purchase:

Dimensions / treatment / operation: With the In comparison, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202 are two cameras that represent the best models in the segment zoom-trip.

For compact cameras, their dimensions are quite large, the TZ202 falls 11, 1 x 6.6 x 4.5 cm even on a larger corner than the RX100 VI with 10.2 x 5.8 x 4, 3 cm. This is partly due to the viewfinder, which can be found in the upper left corner. Sony has installed the viewfinder internally, which saves space and allows more compact dimensions.

The Panasonic camera is slightly larger than the Sony model:

On the left you see the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI, right the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202.

Also in terms of weight, the TZ202 is "forward", 338g to 299g are when you look at the scale. However, differences do not play a major role in practice. In any case, only a jacket pocket or a dedicated camera bag is suitable for transport, the two digital devices do not fit in a trouser pocket.

While the RX100 VI has a smooth front, the TZ202 has an attached handle:

On the left side you can see Sony's Cyber-shot DSC-RX100, on the right side the Panasonic Lumix DC -TZ202.

We very much like the handling of the case. In hand, however, is only the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202 though, the RX100 VI can not really hold up. The reason for this is their smooth surface, the fingers find little support here. Only the thumb rest on the back gives the thumb a certain resistance thanks to a rubberized surface. With the TZ202 Panasonic has solved that much better. On the front there is a small handle with a rubbery and rough surface, here the fingers can grip safely. The thumb rest on the back was also rubberized, the finger can rest comfortably here. For the RX100 VI, we recommend the use of the optional handle AG-R2 due to unconvincing handling. This is adhered to the front and offers better handling.

The back of the [Cyber-shotSonyDSC-RX100 VI:

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI.

The back of the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202:

Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202 ]

The operating concepts of the two cameras differ to some extent. Although there is a lens ring at the front and a programming wheel on the top, Sony uses a command dial and a command dial on the back as another control . Panasonic separates the two and gave the TZ202 next to a dial on the top of an additional control pad at the back. In the daily lives of many photographers, who often work with one of the semi-automatic or manual modes, probably prefer the variant of the TZ202. In any case, it tells us more, and this is due to the rather weak resistance – and therefore not optimal – of the wheel of the RX100 VI.

Here, photographers have to work a little more delicately. The buttons on both cameras are small due to the compact body, their flat position in the case makes pressing easier. Since there are relatively few small and small cameras, we find that the two concepts of operation are very convincing. Manual exposure is also a quick way to reach your goal, but of course, you can work even more comfortably with system cameras.

We also like that the user can freely configure some commands. The RX100 VI has four buttons and the lens ring, and the TZ202 has nine buttons (five touch buttons).

The options of the Fn button on the [Sony Cyber-shot] DSC-RX100 VI:

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI .

The options of the button-Fn in the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202:

Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202 [19659021] A look at the menu reveals that both cameras allow a variety of settings. The menu structure of the TZ202 gives a slightly clearer impression. Because of the many options, however, you must take the time with both cameras until the desired option is found. However, this problem can be avoided if existing user-defined menus are used. You can equip the user with the most important options. We also like quick menus on cameras. It is here that the main parameters of concentration and exposure can be collected, which greatly speeds up the access

Our evaluation of the dimensions, the treatment and the operation: Draw.

Image Quality:
The image sensor used in both cameras is a 13.2 x 8.8 mm model of the 1.0 inch class. While Panasonic, with the exception of the size and resolution (20.2 megapixels as in the RX100 VI) does not make any information on the built-in chip, Sony has more details announced. The Exmor RS sensor of the RX100 VI is backlit and has a special structure (stacked CMOS). This allows a quick reading of the pixels, which is why the camera has special features. We will discuss it in the rest of our review

The sensitivity of the sensor can be chosen between ISO 80 and ISO 25 600, but only ISO 125 to ISO 12 800 are acceptable. ISO 80, ISO 100 and ISO 25 600 are panasonic extensions, on the RX100 VI ISO 80 and ISO 100. In addition, ISO 25 600 can only be set if the multiframe noise reduction is selected.

Comparison of image quality with ISO 125 (day):

The image quality according to three extracts in detail:

The image quality of both cameras is at a very similar level, but the RX100 VI is slightly ahead. In the daytime, both cameras reproduce about the same level of detail and in the compact category the image quality is higher

Comparison of image quality at ISO 3.200 (night):

Image quality based on three Detail details:

Under poor lighting conditions – and when higher sensor sensitivities become needed – the RX100 VI dissolves better fine structures, the internal noise reduction of the camera does not smooth images as much as with the TZ202. However, the differences are not huge.

ISO 6 200 cameras can be used well, ISO 6 400 is only limited in use.

Our winner in image quality: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

By clicking the picture below you look at the quality of the images:

In the second part of our comparative test, the Sony VI Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 and the Panasonic Lumix DC-TZ202, among others, the lenses, the speed working and options for microscope image control.

Related Links: