[ad_1]
Thank God, it's almost Thursday! We can not wait to see Rajinikanth and Akshay Kumar together on the big screen. The highly anticipated 2.0 before tomorrow, here's a little guide to the whole movie. 2.0 marks the first collaboration of Akshay Kumar with Rajinikanth. Directed by S Shankar, Akshay Kumar plays the antagonist in the film. Akshay's character, Dr. Richards, is a villainous bird that looks like a creature, the result of a scientific experiment that went wrong in a lab. Dr. Richards targets humans for their extensive use of cell phones, which in his opinion is harmful to birds and animals.
The world will change from tomorrow! # 2Point0# 2Point0De Tomorrow@rajinikanth@akshaykumar@iamAmyJackson@shankarshanmugh@arrahman@resulp@ LycaProductions@DharmaMovies@LycamobileUK@divomoviespic.twitter.com/OvI8n0e2Ev
– 2.0 (@ 2Point0movie) November 28, 2018
While leading a war against the human world, scientist Dr. Vaseegaran (played by Rajinikanth) resurrects his creative robot Chitti to deal with Dr. Richards. Apparently, Chitti (also played by Thalaiva) is the only match against the antagonist and how! The trailer was only an overview of the on-screen battle between Chitti and Dr. Richards that we can expect on the big screen. In the movie 2010 Enthiran, Chitti was dismantled by Dr. Vaseegaran after he became a thug. 2.0 is a sequel to the 2010 blockbuster movie.
The Hindi version of the film is distributed by Karan Johar's Dharma Productions. Bollywood fans are double about 2.0 because of Akshay, who recently revealed interesting anecdotes about her scary look. Every day he had to spend three and a half hours with the prosthetic team to get a good view.
2.0, which would have been built on a budget of 500 crores of rupees, would have recovered up to 370 crore rupees before the film's release through digital rights and satellite.
Meanwhile, 2.0 The Indian Cell Operators Association (IBOC) has lodged a complaint with the Central Board of Film Certification and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting for "promoting an anti-scientific attitude", calling for the suspension of the film.
[ad_2]
Source link