[ad_1]
You will not have missed the hysterical reporting on recent allegations that Apple is strangling its all-new high-end MacBook Pro, but it seems possible that these alarms are too noisy – and Apple has just fixed the problem with a
I saw it on YouTube …
According to rumors, the new high-end Apple's i9 MacBook Pro was designed to slow down the processors more slowly than the # 39; i7 to reduce the heat created during use.
The claims begin with a video report by YouTuber, Dave Lee. He claims that Apple limits the performance of the high-end MacBook Pro chip to prevent the system from overheating.
To support these claims, he shared tests that he showed that a 2019 Core i9 MacBook Pro took longer to render a video file in Adobe Premiere Pro than a MacBook Pro 2017 equipped with Core i7
He argues that Apple needs to increase the speed of fans to cool Macs faster and improve the thermal design of its MacBook Pro. Others can counter his critics by suggesting that Adobe might need to improve the way it handles multicore processors.
Apple's Answer
Update from 7/25/2018: Apple has released a hotfix and a statement in which it says that it has identified a bug of the system that could cause such strangulation in certain circumstances. Excusing, the company pointed out that Mac's performance should now match those claimed on its site.
What about tests?
While Lee has drawn attention with his claims, it seems possible that they are exaggerated. Not only does it seem possible that Adobe has not yet upgraded Premiere to get the best results from Apple's new Macs, but even the Cinebench test that Lee used to determine speeds can to be inaccurate.
Maybe the software is used to blame?
YouTuber, Jonathan Morrison launches his own series of tests on one of the latest MacBook Pros running a Core i9 chip.
His tests show that Final Cut Pro X delivers surprisingly better performance when running a series of relatively common professional workflows on one of the new Macs that you can not hope for using Adobe Premiere Pro for the same tasks.
This difference in performance is immense, suggesting that performance limitations may not reflect Apple's hardware. for the test. These 2017 Premiere tests running on i9 PCs also seem interesting.
Maybe the test suite needs a patch?
It is possible that there is a problem in the test software used in Lee's tests
Dieter Bohn took a moment to ask Cinebench if the test software was accurate on the new Mac
Cinebench stated its application: "has not been improved to measure performance in a meaningful way", adding that "the team development is conscious and will deal with this issue in the future. "
Next, it seems possible that the reference tests generated may be somewhat inaccurate, given the need to upgrade the test suite before meaningful results can be established.
Patrick Moorhead, Analyst at Insights & Strategy, is one of the world's best technology analysts and he reviewed Lee's claims
"The History of MacBook Core i9 on Premiere Pro has not yet convinced me. " wrote: 19459015. "Can not correlate the eleven applications, benchmarks on the Apple website with the findings of YouTube," he added.
Moorhead notes that many applications used in this test were "very heavily strung" and also respected Apple's good reputation.
Apple claims up to 70% performance improvement with its new Macs, which rather refutes Lee's critics
It's complicated
Where does this leave us? -he?
On the one hand, we have a widely repeated assertion that Apple's high-end MacBook Pros may not deliver all that they promise; while on the other we have many reliable sources casting doubt on this claim.
In the end, of course, data about speeds and flows do not provide a complete picture to try to assess the capabilities of any machine. are important, of course, but are only one component of the overall system performance. Performance is also defined by what you are trying to do, the software you use to accomplish this task, and how effectively the hardware, software, and operating system all work together.
Software – same test software – optimized for hardware or hardware operating system will impose its own performance fee, which seems to be the root of the problem Premiere
This is not something that you will solve by putting your Mac in the freezer.
Why does anyone do this unless you want clicks?
What do users say?
It boils down to what you want to do. On this statistic, I can tell you that the dozen or so professional Mac users with whom I spoke this week unanimously hailed the power and performance of their new MacBook Pros.
in the video space will certainly use an external GPU (up to four are supported) to help speed up some tasks, rather than remaining dependent on the basic system for everything.
Senior Colorist Hangman Studios, Byron Wijayawardena works for a company that (among other things) films give performances of some of the world's greatest musical groups. They film the concert, edit it overnight and create professional video clips for use online, on social media, and in full-length movies on the road and at night.
»
He is a professional in the field of high-end video, and he is convinced that new Macs are faster and more efficient. He even told me that some of his company's tasks "would not have been possible" five years ago.
I can not wait to see the future performance tests of the new Apple Macs getting the same kind of attention as Lee's, which makes the reference software used says that it's not a big deal. it can provide "meaningful" performance measures.
In the meantime, I know on which Mac I want to edit the video.
Google +? If you use social media To become a Google+ user, why not join the Kool Aid Corner community of AppleHolic and participate in the conversation as we pursue the spirit of the new Apple model?
Do you have a story? Please send me a line via Twitter and let me know. I would like you to follow me on Twitter so that I can inform you of new articles that I publish and reports that I find.
[ad_2]
Source link
