How good is France? And is Didier Deschamps able to make them as good as they could be?



[ad_1]

Although his team left again without conceding a goal, Didier Deschamps was ready to concede a point.

"We played better, but it was not the perfect match," said the French manager. 0 win over Uruguay. "There were technical imperfections, we can always play better."

Deschamps did not quite mean the last five words in the way they came out, but that's true. Under his leadership, France still has the impression that they can be much better; as they play in themselves; as he can never understand a training in any way actually improve their abundant talent.

The lingering question with the French is whether they are close by as good as they can be


The relevant question for this 2018 World Cup, however, is whether France is already pretty good.

That does not mean that it's a weak competition, or anything of the sort. It's as frustrating as seeing France's brilliant strikers make their way through the games while it's so easy to imagine them triumphant, that brings another quality. The lack of adventure allows great security, knowing that the quality is still sufficient to nick the parties and pass them.

Although it sounds disappointing for a team of such talent, do not sniff it. That's what the Germans have perfected for decades, this persistence that has permeated until this new generation, until they obviously have too much faith in their talent in this World Cup.

That is why there was a very impressive aspect of winning it in Uruguay, even though most of them were rather turgid. At this precise stage, four years ago, France was in the role of Uruguay, because she showed herself so humbly to the Germans. This time it was the Germans

. Raphael Varane was the player who put his bravery to score the lead of a set kick, rather than showing his naivety when he could not defend, like Mats Hummels in 2014. C & # 39; was something else that Deschamps conceded at his press conference.

"I am happy for Raphael, he has acquired four years of experience, these players have grown, have more maturity and baggage.It is necessary."

France is arrival at the last four (REUTERS)

This also means that they have the necessary experience.

Another question that remains with Deschamps is whether he really has a philosophy or a basic idea as a manager or if all of this is only a photocopied follow-up of what He knows he's a player

It's impossible not to notice the parallels with his 1998 side, especially this basic defensive solidity, but then the feeling is that he's putting the attackers on top with a loose plan to know how they should play rather than any deeper approach. From where these displays curiously disconnected.

France is in the semifinals but has not reached the top yet (EPA)

The semi-final will be the subject of a case study in this regard, since it involves two teams and managers of such contrasts. While a former player who has won everything at Deschamps seems willing to sacrifice fluidity to the attack to strengthen defense strength, Roberto Martinez is most concerned about the coordination of his own forward thinking.

Tuesday, France might not play better, but we can get an answer on whether this approach is for the better.

Follow Independent Sport on Instagram here, for all the best pictures, videos and stories from the sports world.

[ad_2]
Source link