Taylor Swift’s $ 1 sexual assault trial cited by Justice Elena Kagan in Supreme Court case

Taylor Swift’s $ 1 sexual assault trial was cited by Justice Elena Kagan in a religious speech case before the Supreme Court.

Kagan discussed ‘the most notorious nominal damages case I know of in recent times’ after Chike Uzuegbunam sued Georgia Gwinnett College for allegedly telling him he was not allowed to proselytize on campus in 2016.

While the university changed its free speech policy a year later and asked Uzuegbunam to drop the case, the former student is still seeking token damages to possibly cover attorney fees or simply set a precedent, similar to Swift’s token reward of $ 1 when she successfully pursued radio. host David ‘Jackson’ Mueller for groping her in 2013.

Judge Elena Kagan discussed ‘the most famous nominal damages case I have seen in recent times’ after Chike Uzuegbunam sued Georgia Gwinnett College for allegedly telling him he was not allowed to proselytize on campus in 2016; seen in 2018

‘Few years ago, [Swift] sued a radio host for sexually assaulting her, and she said, ‘I’m not really interested in your money, I just want $ 1. And this dollar will mean something both to me and to the world of women who have been through what I have been through.

A U.S. District Court and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled the case moot after the college changes its free speech policy, but the former student is waiting for a judge to rule a violation of its rights.

Uzuegbunam filed a lawsuit against the college after campus police prevented it from discussing and distributing literature regarding its religion, citing an “ expressive activity ” policy that encouraged religious conversations to take place in a zone of freedom of expression.

In August 2017, an eight-member jury ruled in favor of Swift after the pop singer accused former radio host David Mueller of fiddling with her in a June 2013 meet-and-greet photoshoot at Pepsi. Center.

“No one thinks that being a victim of sexual assault is really worth a dollar. Nobody thinks that. It’s worth a lot more than that, ”Kagan told Andrew Pinson, who was defending the university. “But that’s all she wanted. She wanted to prove a point ‘

After obtaining one of the two places available in the area, he was again reprimanded by the authorities because he was only allowed to distribute materials and not speak loudly about his faith.

In August 2017, an eight-member jury ruled in favor of Swift after the pop singer accused former radio host David Mueller of fiddling with her in a June 2013 meet-and-greet photoshoot at Pepsi. Center.

“No one thinks that being a victim of sexual assault is really worth a dollar. Nobody thinks that. It’s worth a lot more than that, ”Kagan told Andrew Pinson, who was defending the university. “But that’s all she wanted. She wanted to prove a point.

Boss: In a token nod, Taylor only asked for a payment of $ 1 after his attorney, Doug Baldridge, said at the time: ‘A single dollar on the counterclaim is immeasurably worth. It says no means no and all women determine if it should be tolerated with her body. ”

That’s what happened: the jury gave him $ 1. And it was undoubted physical harm. But, she just asked for that $ 1 to say she was hurt. Why not?’

“ Judge Kagan’s question suggested that what Taylor Swift really wanted was, you know, the moral right rationale, the legal right, that sexual assault is wrong and wrong, ” Justice Amy Coney Barrett said.

In a symbolic nod, Taylor only asked for a payment of $ 1 after his lawyer, Doug Baldridge, said at the time: ‘A single dollar on the counterclaim is immeasurably worth. Saying no means no and all women determine if it should be tolerated with her body.

Mueller first sued the singer, her mother, and radio promotions director Frank Bell in 2015, accusing them of interfering with his $ 150,000 a year contract as a radio DJ in Denver by putting pressure on his employer, KYGO radio, to fire him.

Swift counterattacked Mueller for assault and battery after suing her for falsely accusing her of groping her, costing her her job. The judge dismissed his lawsuit against Swift, saying he could not prove his allegations had him fired from KYGO radio station.

Swift counter-attacked Mueller for assault and battery after suing her for falsely accusing her of groping her, which cost her her job