The announcement of access from donors Elizabeth Warren explains the lack of large donors.

Elizabeth Warren announced Monday that she would not organize private fundraising events and would not make personal phone calls to wealthy donors during the 2020 Democratic primary. when the candidate's heart is in the right place and the donor is well-intentioned, "she wrote in a statement," this time creates a direct relationship between wealth and access to our political leaders. " As such, she says: "We will take the time that presidential candidates usually reserve to woo wealthy donors. Use it instead to create an organizing event after an event organized in the first primary states and across the country. "

Basically, it is a logical answer to a problem facing all elected officials, not just candidates for the presidency. A former Democrat congressman who became a supporter of campaign finance reform said he spent 30 to 40 hours a week fundraising; A former Republican legislator involved in the same effort described the members of Congress as "telemarketers with great titles". In an article published in 2018 for Intercept, a former Obama staff member, Paul Perry, who had dropped his bid for a seat in the Pennsylvania Congress, said that the first written submission that he had made was that he was not a candidate. he received from the National Democratic Party after launching his campaign was a mere $ 200,000 collection order. Hillary Clinton basically took advantage of a week of public campaign in August 2016 to raise funds at private events. It seems likely that one of the reasons why American politicians are generally more conservative than the entire electorate in tax matters, like taxing the rich, is simply because they spend most of their time interacting with the rich.

This decision also has a strategic meaning for Warren in that few rich people queued to donate to his campaign (or to act as a "fundraising bundle" for other important donations, an important role being since direct contributions to candidates are legally limited to $ 2,700) in the first place. Warren's history as a defender of financial regulation would have earned her a "toxic" name among Democrats with ties to Wall Street, and even if she wanted to sue the big Dems donors, she would be competing with her. other candidates in primary school like Kamala. Harris, Cory Booker and Kirsten Gillibrand who would have started fundraising in the party for months. (Joe Biden would also attract a lot of donors when he introduced himself.) In 2016, Bernie Sanders organized some private donor events, but most of the time he raised his money through small donations from the grassroots. With the announcement on Monday, Warren enjoys a total distance to assert integrity: it probably should have taken a basic approach, anyway.

A big problem for her, though, is that Bernie Sanders also participates in the primary, and he has abundantly demonstrated after the launch of last week's campaign that he kept the loyalty of many progressive donors. Harris, who recorded his impressive small donor figure after announcing his announcement, took the lead in Warren's polls while superimposing an anti-corporate message on his often business-friendly story. For the moment, at least, Warren seems to be winning the primary ideas but not the race to persuade real voters. The good news for her is that she still has 11 months left to convince Iowa hobbyists. So there are still plenty of opportunities to see if replacing the time spent looking for the rich with real normal speeches The time spent with people via organizational events in the field – which, by the way, was Basically the Beto O 'Rourke strategy during the Texas Senate race in 2018 – is just crazy enough to work.