The bet on the dismissal is not worth it without "very graphic proof"

HThe chairman of the Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Rushed Monday for the defense of the President of the House, Nancy Pelosi, saying that only "factual evidence" would justify a bet of removal against the President Trump.

"In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to obtain the necessary support in the Senate for a successful impeachment process, and again, my feeling is to see what Bob Mueller produces. should be pretty overwhelming, "Schiff told CNN.

Throughout the caucus, Democrats were asked to comment on Pelosi, D-Calif., Who abruptly closed the door on impeachment in an interview published Monday.

"I'm not on trial," Pelosi told the Washington Post. "The impeachment is so divisive for the country that unless there is something more convincing, crushing and bipartisan, I do not think we should go that route because it divides the country. not worth it.

Democrats have long wondered whether Trump was compromised by the Russians during investigations led by special advocate Robert Mueller and members of the congressional committee. Under the new Democratic leadership of this mandate, congressional panels, including the House Intelligence Committee, are also embarking on a thorough investigation of Trump's financial transactions, as well as Russia.

In October, Schiff opened the door to Trump's indictment for tax evasion on families, but he also misrepresented expectations in an interview in January in which he had stated that Trump would likely be removed from office .

Schiff firmly insisted that his committee would continue its work unhindered, regardless of what Mueller's report said. He also said at the end of February that if the full report of Mueller's investigation had not been made public after its completion, his panel would have him appear before Parliament for what he testified.