[ad_1]
The fatal shootout of a Uber passenger in New Mexico, allegedly following the debate over charges for vomit in the back seat of the driver's car, drew attention to a more general tendency to "vomit fraud". sector of origin.
According to Uber's policy, passengers must pay a cleaning fee of 80 to 150 USD for vomit in the driver's vehicle. But users of Uber, Lyft and other similar services in the country have reported cases of "vomit fraud", in which some drivers allegedly mistakenly claimed that a passenger would have hesitated to tack and pock the extra money.
Although it is unclear whether the New Mexico case is due to fraudulent charges, the mere discussion of a possible charge of cleansing would apparently be enough to boil the blood, according to reports.
THE MISSING UBER DRIVER IS FOUND DEATH OUTSIDE THE PHILADELPHIA RAILWAY STATION, FAMILY SAYS; ANOTHER DRIVER FOUND DEATH AT DELAWARE
The driver involved in the shooting death in New Mexico was not charged on Friday morning, while the prosecution was continuing its investigation. But James Porter's family, the passenger who was killed along Interstate 25 near Montano, New Mexico, is suing the driver – along with Uber, claiming that the operator of the E-tolling had been careless during hiring, storage and supervising the driver.
The driver claims to have shot Porter in self-defense as their dispute over the cleansing costs of vomit intensified, the Albuquerque Journal reported.
"Attorneys are currently reviewing hundreds of documents and videos," said Michael Patrick, spokesman for the Bernalillo District Attorney's Office, at the Albuquerque Journal. "An impeachment decision could be made in the coming weeks."
Court documents indicate that Porter and his friend Jonathan Reyes called for a Uber ride after celebrating St. Patrick's Day at a bar near San Mateo. NM Reyes then told the police that he had drunk six or seven drinks on the day of the shooting, but did not remember any more clearly the events. leading to the death of his friend.
The Uber application icon is visible on a phone in New York on June 12, 2018. (Associated Press)
According to the story of the driver, Reyes would have dropped out of the back seat and Porter would have started arguing with the driver, begging him not to charge him a cleaning fee, reported the Albuquerque Journal. (Fox News does not report the driver's name because it was not charged.)
According to the newspaper, the driver indicated that he had stopped, ordered the two passengers out of the car, ended the race and awarded Porter a "star" rating as as passenger of the Uber application.
When Porter slammed the door of the vehicle, the driver got out of the car and the two men continued to shout at him, reported the driver to the police.
According to the affidavit of a police search warrant, the driver allegedly unsheathed his gun and ordered Porter to back off, but Porter threatened to knock him over with his own car if the driver did not want him to shoot on. When Porter approached the driver's open side door, he shot him an unknown blast, according to the newspaper.
The driver claimed that he had pulled out his gun after Porter threw him a pair of sunglasses, reported Albuquerque's KOB-TV channel.
Porter was dead when the officers arrived at the scene. Reyes was squatting near his body.
Reyes told the police that he did not even remember getting into the Uber that day and only vaguely remembered that the police had taken his clothes and l? had brought to the police station. The driver was released while the investigation was continuing. Uber told the newspaper that the driver in question no longer had access to the app.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
In 2018, the Miami Herald reported an upsurge of "vomit frauds" allegedly committed by Uber and Lyft drivers. The newspaper documented the claims of several Uber cyclists who reportedly had to pay cleaning fees even though they did not vomit in the car. Pilots must submit photos to the app showing the vomit in the vehicle. Uber then adds the cleaning fee to the riders' receipts after the trips.
In some cases, the riders reported that their receipt contained fake pictures of vomit. They claimed to have come out of a clean car and claimed that drivers had brandished the photo for them to pay extra.
Uber told the Herald that "the vast majority of cleanup expense reports are legitimately the result of a person doing damage in the car. In cases where we find a confirmed case of fraud, we take appropriate action. "
Runners may report false vomiting reports through the help function of the application.
[ad_2]
Source link