[ad_1]
"California, play !!"
Target Sports USA, a firearms supplier and outfitter, did not restrain its jubilation on Tuesday in an email confirming its membership in many stores and sellers to ship in California high-capacity magazines, now banned from smuggling.
The movement basically consists of opening the valves of the firearm.
The cheerleaders on the site take the above images of an assortment of Glock magazines with 17 cartons selling for $ 20 and PMAG with 30 cartridges, a magazine of military quality based on polymers intended for AR-15 platform rifle: US $ 12.30 each with missive: "Due to the reversal of California Penal Code 32310, Target Sports USA is pleased to announce that California customers can purchase magazines from big capacity!"
Since Friday afternoon, the country's arms dealers and wholesalers are sending "freedom" to Californian consumers, after its nearly 20-year-old law prohibiting high-capacity magazines – those containing more than 10 cartridges – has was quashed by US District Judge Roger Benitez. -page decision at the San Diego Federal Court.
The joy will be short-lived.
On Thursday, the judge acquiesced to California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and granted a stay of judgment that will reinstate the ban imposed by California Penal Code 32310, lifted Friday at the close of business. This gave sellers and consumers the time they needed to buy and sell magazines before they became illicit items again.
Magazines holding more than 10 rounds are "weapons", concluded Benitez in its initial decision, citing the ban of 2000 (and the subsequent proposal 63 adopted in 2016) as unconstitutional in that it "weighed on the core of the Second Amendment ".
He claimed that 32310 criminalizes "the acquisition and possession of these magazines that are generally held by law-abiding citizens to defend themselves, their homes and their states …." Criminalizes the acquisition and possession, otherwise lawful, of regular magazines containing more than 10 shots, magazines that law-abiding citizens responsible would choose for self-defense at home. "
Benitez even compared the violation of the right to bear arms to the Second Amendment, to the flagrant violations of the endangered British rule in America several centuries ago.
"This decision is a calculation of freedom decided long ago by settlers who cherished individual freedom more than the subordinate security of a British leader," wrote Benitez. "The freedom they fought for was not free then, and it's not free now."
Once the green light is formalized, the inventory of large or large capacity magazines is disappearing, both in-store and online.
Some of the online business owners Newsweek Interviewees said the lion's share of the large-capacity magazines had been purchased and shipped to Golden State.
"There has been a significant increase and interest in all of California since Friday," said Eric Ward, owner of Houston-based 4Ward Defense and Training, run by HoustonGunsOnline.com.
He believes that California's "purchasing power", as one of the world's largest economies, is already huge and could transform many types of industries, with the firearms industry not making " no exception ".
"California is a very strict and draconian firearms legislation that imposes arbitrary limitations on the ability of a firearm at any given time," Ward said.
At Impact Guns in Ogden, Utah, an employee who gave only his first name, Samuel, said Newsweek that the stores for the AR-15 style rifles were "definitely increased" in California, but added that "there are also orders for all kinds of different magazines".
In 2017, California was one of the top three US states in terms of the number of firearms, with 344,622 firearms, according to Recorded firearms statistics from the National Firearms Act published by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
A few hours after the original order was placed on March 29, William McNeil appeared in a YouTube video featuring PMAG's 40-lap magazine. The 42-year-old, 42-year-old had just returned from a family trip to Las Vegas, where he had suspended a plastic bag containing $ 500 worth of treats from Bass Pro Shops.
"I took it out of the package a little earlier," McNeil said. "And while I know it's not a big deal for most of the country, it's a big problem for us here in California.
"Being able to buy this, own this, own this and show it here on YouTube without worrying that something will happen – you know it's fantastic. The timing of this video is perfectly legal at 100%. "
In an interview with Newsweek, McNeil proudly defended his right to be able to take advantage of the order of Benitez.
"I am basing myself on the second amendment," he said. "Until you're really in a hurry on what is supposed to be a right and you feel that compression for decades, it's hard to understand."
The feeling of Christmas in April was not lost for its viewers. One of them shared the vertigo of the gun.
A commentator known as "jlac" introduced the judge as a kind of saint who encouraged the country early.
"God bless Judge Benitez! We have magazines and magazines on the way! It's like Christmas! Haha," commented the commentator.
Civil rights lawyer Chuck Michel, who is leading the California Rifle & Pistol Association (RCAP) battle in the Duncan v. Becerra case that culminated in Friday's ruling, marveling at the level of demand in a state that has been laden with restrictions on its weapons.
"There is a huge and pent-up demand for these magazines because people recognize their value as tools of self-defense," said Michel Newsweek.
He referred to California's central law of 2000 under which firearms manufacturers "revise their California parcels" and abandon what are called "standard capacity magazines", which are actually large magazines that contain 15, 17 or 21 cartridges. those in the firearms community are considered "low" or "small" magazines with 10 cartridges.
The lifting of the ban put California on par with many other states that already use magazines with large or large capacity.
"Magazines of 10 strokes or less are actually an anomaly in the firearms market," said Ward. "If you have to have a magazine of small, restricted capacity, you are the outlier."
The industry standard, he said, goes from 15 to 20, 30 or 40 magazines.
Roger, an Ohio – based weapons provider who asked that only his first name be used, echoed Ward 's. "High capacity chargers are the norm," he said. "That's what comes with all the guns out there.
"It's freedom. People want their freedom. That's what it is. "
And freedom since Friday is rare.
"We do not have any PMAG anymore," said Roger. "We sell them non-stop to retailers in California."
Specifically, resellers and wholesalers consult magazines made from Magpul's PMAGS or D-50 and D-60 (which contain 50 or 60 cartridges) that fly off shelves.
Magpul's magazines have conquered the public among law enforcement and gun owners because they are favored by US soldiers.
"They have a military contract and everyone wants what the military has," Roger said.
Ward of 4Ward Defense and Training, along with other industry experts Newsweek spoke to, confirmed that there was a race on the magazines of this manufacturer. Following the announcement of the lifting of the ban, a major wholesaler was in possession of 11,000 magazines in AR-15 format with 30 cartridges, Ward said.
However, from Sunday night, "they were sold."
California demand has also led to rapid price increases.
Brownells Outfitter, headquartered in Grinnell, Iowa, is one of the most popular sellers of firearms products. She added a red, white and blue banner on her site, titled: "Sending Freedom to California", and below: can buy any gun magazine in our inventory. "
This inventory has rapidly decreased.
Take the D-60 battery charger. Sunday night, it cost $ 104. The next day, the price climbed to $ 123.00.
Wednesday, all had been sold, according to the website. (NewsweekBrownells' calls were not immediately recalled at the time of publication.)
At San Diego's GlockStore (the same city where the judge threw the magazine ban), a customer service representative named Jon N., 31, confirmed that all his magazine stocks " more than 15 rounds "were just out of stock.
"It was hectic," he said. "Sales have been off the charts."
He said people were buying "five at a time" Glock 17s (17-disc magazines) for $ 30 and 33-rpm magazines (he referred to them by the abbreviated term "big sticks") at $ 49.
For many, the motivation to buy wholesale was the general prediction that the lifting of the ban would not last.
"I heard that the reprieve was coming soon, so it's really a window of opportunity," he had said before Benitez imposed it.
Indeed, the fireworks on Friday will now make a hangover.
"CA is the leading country in gun safety," California Attorney General Becerra said Tuesday. "Yesterday we called for the suspension of a court decision endangering the state's firearms law prohibiting individuals from acquiring new high-capacity magazines."
He continued, "We intend to protect our people and our gun safety laws from senseless attacks. We refuse to go back. "
Prior to the official suspension, Michel acknowledged that the buying wave would probably end when the opposition found a way to temporarily reinstate the ban.
"With the injunction in force, the acquisition of these magazines is legal, but a suspension has been requested and if the injunction is suspended, the acquisition will no longer be legal," confirmed Michel at the time.
He acknowledged that the AG of Calfornia, Governor Gavin Newsom, and other gun defense groups had "a lot of smart lawyers" who "were trying to find a way to overturn this decision and to distance the recently acquired magazines from those who bought them ".
Ari Freilich, a lawyer for the Giffords Law Center's nonprofit group, said that Benitez's order was "an extreme decision that rejects the thoughtful judgment of California voters" and seeks to authorize high-capacity magazines. – essentially away with decades of time that have banned manufacturing and selling in California.
"Simply, this decision would allow more people to access the most appropriate weapons for mass killing instead of self-defense," he said. "No other federal court has ever held that the limitations imposed on this type of weapon compromise the right or ability of Americans to defend themselves.
"All other competent courts have focused on the unique dangers that high-capacity magazines present to the public by allowing shooters to continuously fire on a large number of human targets without interruption."
The judge explained his decision by invoking various women who, over the years, faced violent armed clashes. He also claimed that they were entitled to more ammunition.
After firing, "she had no place to carry an extra magazine and no way to reload because her left hand was holding the phone with which she was still trying to call 911", noted her decision to 39, a woman named Zhu Chen, who fought three armed intruders with a gun.
Benitez also seemed to suggest that mass shootings aroused too much concern over incidents like this, where the death toll is significantly lower.
"Does the life of these victims have a lower value than those lost during a large-scale shootings?" Asked Benitez in his decision. "Would their death be less tragic? Unless there are many individual victims together, the tragedy goes largely unnoticed. "
But when the suspension begins, the California rush will probably end, or at least stop.
A few hours after the confirmation of Benitez's order, Las Vegas-based Arms Unlimited sent an e-mail informing customers: "ALERT: California: last chance for magazines … NO ORDER AFTER APRIL 5, 4:59 PM. "
At the moment, the suspension of the order will likely prevent the shipment or purchase of large capacity magazines in California after 5 pm. on Friday and probably lead to more hearings.
But buyers and sellers would violate California law if they decided not to consider their purchases, or even if their purchases were in transit, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned after Friday's deadline.
"If an individual order of magazines" large capacity "is ordered by an online distributor and during the shipping process, a subsequent order of a court suspends the application of the injunction ( the section of the penal code prohibiting high-capacity magazines) will again be indeed, "according to the NRA.
To remain or not to stay, Michel was firmly convinced that the government could not come back to take possession nor force the Californians to lose them.
"They were legally acquired, so unless they are prohibited from possession, they are legal," he said.
Youtube
McNeil, who has already tried new purchases from Bass Pro Shops in Las Vegas, is committed to keeping what he has been buying since lifting the ban.
"Now that I have acquired them legally, you can not take them without compensation or legal process."
And if the letters or the door buttons came to claim them, he would not give in.
"I'm not going to give my belongings legally." Period. "
[ad_2]
Source link