[ad_1]
James Damore was fired by Google in August 2017 after writing a note suggesting that the predominance of male engineers within the company resulted in part from innate differences between men and women rather than discrimination. In January 2018, Damore filed a lawsuit alleging that the company discriminated against whites, men and conservatives. Today, a judge rejected Google's third attempt to dismiss the lawsuit. From San Jose Mercury News:
The decision of Judge Brian Walsh, of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, means that the case, which Damore filed at the end of 2004 in favor of arbitration, can move to the discovery phase …
The court rejected three different Google motions to dismiss the complaint. Complainants can now request access to internal Google documents to try to support their allegations, some of whom are "denied employment because of their actual or perceived Conservative political activities and affiliations, and their status." as "real or supposed Asian or Caucasian male employment". applicants, "according to the trial.
As mentioned above, Damore left the trial but two other men are still suing him with the same lawyers. The Hollywood Reporter describes the history of the current lawsuit:
In January 2018, Damore and former Googler David Gudeman filed a class action lawsuit against the technology giant. They claim that society is an ideological echo chamber and that it "discriminated, abused and systematically punished and fired", which disagreed with the majority's view of "diversity", "sensitivity to prejudice" and "social justice".
They later changed their complaint to add two other men, Stephen McPherson and Michael Burns, who had been removed from Google, and another employee who finally voluntarily rejected his assertions …
Damore and Gudeman agreed in November to arbitrate their complaints against Google, leaving only McPherson and Burns' claims that they would have been removed from work because Google is illegally minorities to the detriment of men, whites and Asians. candidates and discriminates against conservative candidates politically.
In his ruling today, Walsh J. suggested that he "had doubts about the viability of the alleged political underclass". However, he is ready to let the plaintiffs at least argue the case after they have had the chance to find out. Harmeet Dhillon, attorney representing McPherson and Burns issued a statement:
At the hearing, the court dismissed Google's applications for judgment on the pleadings, the strike, and its commander. The case is now in the discovery phase, allowing plaintiffs' lawyers access to Google's internal documents, as well as other potential evidence to support their claims, in anticipation of a claim. class action certification.
Will there really be documents in support of discriminatory hiring decisions? To be clear, I have no doubt that the culture of society actively discourages conservative men, but the nature of any culture is that the rules (usually) are not written for foreigners to examine. Instead, they are absorbed by social cues and private conversations. I guess that's how things work at Google, but who knows? Perhaps the progressive monoculture is so arrogant that people actually wrote memos expressing their prejudices. It will certainly be interesting to see the process of discovery.
[ad_2]
Source link