[ad_1]
The Ministry of Justice maintains that the two banks should not have to transmit the information cited and accuses lawmakers of not taking appropriate measures to search for the documents.
This is the first time the Department of Justice has spoken in this fight to appear. His incursion into the case came as House Democrats tried to retrieve Trump's financial records and consider a formal procedure to remove the president.
On Friday, the second US Federal Court of Appeals will consider whether two banks, Deutsche Bank and Capital One, will have to pass Trump's information to the House committees. Judge Jon Newman, appointed by Jimmy Carter, and Judges Debra Ann Livingston and Peter Hall, both appointed by President George W. Bush, will hear the arguments.
In Monday's legal brief, the justice department widely criticized the way in which the House authorized subpoenas before proceeding to a vote in the House. They also allege that the Democrats in the House are unfairly targeting the Speaker.
"Committees investigating far-reaching public issues, such as money laundering, do not exercise this discretion properly by making the president and his family the sole or principal target. their investigations, or even one of their goals, "writes the Justice Department.
The assignments, sent this spring by the House's intelligence and financial services committees to Deutsche Bank and Capital One, are intended to provide financial information spread over Trump, his children and his businesses for years. The committees say they need this information to investigate banking activities, money laundering and foreign influence in the United States.
Moreover, the Department of Justice argues that subpoenas could divert Trump from his job as president if he was "drawn into a myriad of simultaneous congressional investigations".
A federal district judge in Manhattan ruled against Trump at the district level, saying he would not block congressional investigations. Shortly after, Trump appealed.
"It is not the role of the Court or the plaintiffs to judge the necessity (of Congress), particularly in light of the court's findings that the requested records are relevant to what is probably a lawful inquiry. of the Congress ", Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District. of New York ruled at the time. Trump, his family and his businesses "have not raised any serious issues going to the bottom" of the case, Ramos said in court.
On Monday, the brief of the Ministry of Justice asks the court of appeal to annul the decision of Ramos.
[ad_2]
Source link