[ad_1]
Realized by: Jon Favreau
Written by: Jeff Nathanson
Runtime: 118 minutes
MPAA ranking: PG rated for sequences of violence and peril and some thematic elements
Donald Glover – Simba
Chiwetel Ejiofor – scar
James Earl Jones – Mufasa
Beyonce Knowles-Carter – Nala
Alfre Woodard – Sarabi
John Oliver – Zazu
Seth Rogen – Pumbaa
Billy Eichner – Timon
John Kani – Rafiki
Florence Kasumba – Shenzi
Keegan-Michael Key – Kamari
Eric André – Azizi
JD McCrary – Young Simba
Shahadi Wright Joseph – Young Nala
From the business point of view, Walt Disney Studios remake of The Lion King, one of his most iconic animated films in history, was inevitable. Even the remake of Aladdin, starring Will Smith, has brought in nearly a billion dollars worldwide, despite its poor execution. Also, to call this new version of The Lion King a real action movie is an abuse of language. Director Jon Favreau emphasized. The new movie is not a real action movie. None of this has been created with legitimate environments or actors. To his detriment, all the experience was created via a computer. It is a photorealistic film animated by computer graphics, but it is not yet an action movie.
The Lion King is not a remake of blow for blow, but a stage remake for stage. There are changes, new songs and additions to reduce the time of execution, since the original movie only lasted 88 minutes. The changes in the film are arbitrary. They do not much improve the experience in any way, nor do they really add a kind of decisive new achievement.
For example, Favreau probably thought that it was too embarrassing for Rafiki to look more like a shaman and to walk around in Pride Rock with a stick, even though it's well established that primates use tools in nature. Oddly enough, Rafiki's staff appears inexplicably much later in the film. The production team made sure to avoid showing a photorealistic monkey in CG, shaman of a fictional version of the animal kingdom, using a stick for his work. If it's unrealistic for Rafiki to have a stick as a shaman, why is it more realistic to tidy it up like a Grayskull sword, to pull it out and use it as a stick of ################################################################################# 39, experienced bow later in the film? It does not mean anything.
Another problem is the interpretation of Scar's new movie, "Be Prepared," which was totally slaughtered in the new movie. It's hardly even a song or a music number. Chiwetel Ejiofor is a great talent, but he does not even sing at all. He speaks rhymed almost everything and it's over. And that's how most of 2019 Lion King feels. Certainly, some of the classical music resists. The film contains pretty eyes and magic, but it's like a lion hunted, cut up, stuffed and thrown on a coat of mantle in a box of hunters. There is no inner life or soul in this film.
Yes, the team and the animators of Favreau have managed to create impressive and very detailed sequences. Some of them look impressive, maybe even beautiful. But what does $ 250 million first-class images really mean if there's no emotional connection to the story and the characters on the screen? The big effects on the CG are not great effects on the CG if they dampen the emotional resonance of what the film is trying to describe. The film has almost no emotional resonance.
Nature documentaries on the BBC evoke more emotions than the new Lion Kingwhich is nothing more than an envelope. There is no expressiveness on the faces of the characters. They speak, but their mouths barely move. Their faces have blank expressions. Most of their body language does not even seem to look like genuine articles. It becomes a problem when Favreau and his production team try to adapt the same scenes of the original film, while making the animal characters move and act more like real animals, because he is supposed to look "alive" ". From a visual point of view, this style does not work.
The Lion King creates a strangely weird effect like a valley. The animators have not been able to really create living and breathing characters in a story. Therefore, The Lion King loses all meaning of immersion.
With regard to the changes made to the film, it seems that Favreau has tried to create a better atmosphere and better illuminate the night scenes. Many scenes that used to take place in dark or nocturnal environments are very bright in the middle of the day. "Can you feel the love tonight?" Takes place while Simba and Nala face each other during the day, enlightened. Where is this romantic mood dimly lit? This is extended to the darker version of Pride Rock controlled by Scar. Even Scar's perversion in Simba's lush and vibrant homeland has lost much of its dark menace.
The vocal performances of the actors are certainly not helped by the rather innocuous attitude conveyed throughout the experience. Certainly, most actors in these types of large animated productions do their work individually, rather than playing with other actors. But listening to the vocal performances of The Lion KingThis is exactly what the actors are saying: as if they were all alone recording their aftershocks in the cabin. Specifically, Beyonce's performance as an adult Nala has an artificial rigidity. His lines are very precise, but that's about it. John Oliver (Zazu), Billy Eichner (Timon) and Seth Rogen (Pumbaa) give the impression that they are trying to inject a little humor, but it is always embarrassing to hear that their dialogue comes from animals Photo. It's like they're talking but did not really believe what they were saying. The effect recalls the Hollywood actors who had the habit of doubling the film in 2013. Walking with dinosaurs film, with similar results clumsy.
A big part of this problem is that the physical character models have neither life nor visual expression. They can not really develop these "expressive" reactions or features in a 2D animated version. The characters of The Lion King miss a significant part of their performance. What the animators did not manage to achieve with the remake of 2019 testifies to the crucial and primordial importance of the animators of the Renaissance of Disney for these classic and emblematic films. They created an important part of the acting game and the physical performance of the characters. They made these flat and hand-drawn characters into living, breathing and indelible icons. The characters appeared on the screen in a vivid way.
The characters of The Lion King inspired and evoked as much emotion in an audience as any live performance of the story. When the story of the new film unfolds, there is no emotional connection between Simba, Mufasa, Timon, Pumbaa, Scar, Nala, Rafiki and Sarabi. There is no chemistry. There is no visual poetry. As such, these characters also have no emotional connection to the audience.
<! –
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that exists with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.
<! –
->
[ad_2]
Source link
The final score: review
Torture
The 411
Remake The Lion King to appear photorealistic was a major mistake. Favreau and his team have clearly made a breakthrough. However, giving a realistic look to animated CG movies while retaining the music, scenes and dialogues of the original only underscores the gap that remains with photorealistic CGIs. Is it possible that children and families are always involved in this case? Yes. But why look at a swollen, lifeless and soulless movie room while the classic, iconic original is still available? Let's hope that Disney will soon run out of iconic animated films to redo, and that this phase will have ended.