[ad_1]
Most Americans want more control over firearms. Why does not it happen?
Polls show strong support for tougher laws, especially after mass shootings. But there is also deep disagreement, fierce opposition and growing disenchantment with gun control.
Polls show strong support for tougher laws, especially after mass shootings. But there is also deep disagreement, fierce opposition and growing disenchantment with gun control.
Large capacity magazines are again out of the market for California gun owners.
A federal judge who last week overturned a California law banning large-capacity firearms shippers agreed to temporarily suspend the enforcement of his decision as the state prepared to challenge its decision in the United States. 9th circuit court of appeal.
Suspension of the decision means that firearms owners in California can not buy magazines containing more than 10 cartridges. They can keep high-capacity magazines that they own.
On March 29, Justice Roger Benitez issued a burning opinion that California's ban on high-capacity magazines violated the Second Amendment California's right to possess firearms.
He detailed scenarios in which a large capacity magazine would be useful for someone trying to protect themselves from a criminal. He also criticized the law of the state, which would have been excessive to prevent mass shooting.
Arms manufacturers and ammunition retailers immediately seized Benitez's decision to sell products to Californians. The manufacturer Beretta, for example, has promoted a discount on its online store in connection with a court decision.
Becerra filed this week a motion seeking a stay of the decision, saying the lifting of the ban would allow large – capacity firearms magazines to be sent to California.
"It's clear that some are now trying to flood the state of California with what was up to that decision, from the large-capacity illegal magazines, the type of magazines used in firearms to creating large-scale shootings. scale that we have seen throughout this country, "said Becerra at a press conference.
The court of Benitez released Friday its order granting the request of Becerra.
Benitez wrote: "The court understands that people of good will on both sides of constitutional and social policy issues experience strong emotions. The Court understands that thoughtful and law-abiding citizens can and do have strong opposing views on the restrictions imposed on firearms magazines. This concerns the judicial deliberations. Maintaining the status quo immediately during the judicial review process offers an immeasurable societal benefit. "
[ad_2]
Source link