[ad_1]
The Mets took four terrible starts (wins) between two attempts under normal (losses). We may call a coincidence that these mediocre efforts came from Noah Syndergaard to Wilson Ramos.
But that would require us to settle in the country of unreality with Mickey Callaway.
Before opening the series Friday against the Dodgers, the Mets manager described Syndergaard as someone who "does not let anything touch him", while Callaway had served as a sounding board (and sometimes screaming) ) for the declared desire of Syndergaard not to launch the match against Ramos. Callaway also continued to call Syndergaard "one of the top five pitchers in the world", which we can only deny for three years when right-handed launched Tomas Nido or Rene Rivera.
The fact that Ramos again caught Syndergaard on Friday was negligence, stubbornness or a bellicose attitude on the part of the Mets. If it was a punishment, then it was the worst hope for the Mets' meager hopes.
Would Syndergaard have played better in what became a 9-2 Dodgers triumph if Nido or Rivera caught him? This is unknowable. What we understand is the level of comfort of Syndergaard and its line of statistics are much higher with Nido or Rivera. The last two starts with Ramos have resulted in five-run, four-point and one-point results – and Mets defeats.
Before and after the last game against the Phillies, Syndergaard informed the Mets of his disenchantment with the pair. And then – via an exclusivity in The Post – the discontent became public. And yet, the Mets gave Nido Marcus Stroman for a second consecutive start, while the minor finals would have associated Syndergaard to one of its favorite sensors.
Perhaps the Mets have felt the need to put Stroman on the road or they see Stroman, but not Syndergaard, as part of the 2020 team. But why devalue the commercial value of Syndergaard? More relevant in real time: Why destabilize it while every game is so precious right now? This loss caused the Mets to lose three games on the second Wild Card with 15 players to play.
Callaway said Syndergaard had made two bad shots, but one was a tantalizing captivating curve that Gavin Lux scored for a three-point circuit to break the score from 1-1 to fourth. Maybe it happens with Nido or Rivera. But here are the facts: Syndergaard allowed 15 circuits in 405 appearances (one out of 27) with Ramos and three in 264 with Nido or Rivera (one every 88).
It seems that no matter who can catch Syndergaard when he hums, since it was the first three innings, with a player in the first leg of J.D. Davis offering a 1-0 lead. But Cody Bellinger, in the fourth quarter, made a decisive pass. Suddenly, Syndergaard did not hum. He is clearly shaken by the running and the next two batters hit singles with men in motion. This brought a race for a tie. Lux, the next batter, amassed three and the Dodgers were routed.
When asked if Syndergaard needed one of his security sensors the most, Callaway replied, "It's a better question for Noah. a line. Of course, he wants the Ramos attack, but what is the point of Syndergaard's letting the games escape because of a lack of confidence in the defense?
Syndergaard was in a mode of defusing and indifference about the player who caught him in the fourth, saying, "It's just up to me to run throws."
What is true. This is not an attempt to exonerate Syndergaard. It's a talented guy whose best is needed, especially now, no matter who catches. But Kershaw is the best pitcher of his generation, and when he reached the age of Syndergaard, he insisted on launching A.J. Ellis, a light backup. One of the manager's main tasks is to put players in a position to succeed – and this is not currently the case with Syndergaard.
Before the match, Callaway had given among his longest and most sinister answers of the last two years as head of Mets to some questions about Syndergaard and Ramos. was being renewed on Friday night. Callaway knows the numbers. The EER Syndergaard with Ramos is now at 5.20. He is 2.17 in 22 career games with Nido; 2.52 in 29 games with Rivera. The best segment of Syndergaard this year came when he was paired with Nido for seven consecutive starts.
This is not a coincidence. The Mets may continue negligence or stubbornness or belligerency. But the biggest loser in this case is not Syndergaard. It's his employer and his manager.
[ad_2]
Source link