[ad_1]
IIt's one thing for a newsroom to go out of their way and inflate a congressman. It is quite another thing to help this legislator to lie.
The New York Times did just that when it published this week's tour de force for the absurd Green New Deal by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
The article, "Urged by climate activists, Democrats in the Senate plan to" go on the offensive "" is rather commonplace. This is exactly the kind of thing you expect from a news agency that is more likely to be sympathetic to the Democrats' $ 93 trillion plan to rebuild the US economy.
But there is a section in the Times report that is particularly egregious. It reads:
The Green New Deal immediately won the membership of several Democratic presidential candidates, including senators Kamala Harris of California, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont.
But it was also
annoyed, the website of Ms Ocasio-Cortez wrongly published a draft summary of the document containing disputed provisions not endorsed by these candidates, such as a text calling on economic security "for all those who can not or do not want to work . "
The authors of this passage are ignorant or dishonest. Ocasio-Cortez and his allies have seriously jostled the rollout of his Green New Deal proposal by publishing a ridiculously ridiculous "Frequently Asked Questions" page that included nonsense about "farting cows" and "economic security for all who can not do not want to work. His office provided the press rooms with copies of this FAQ. This was not a mistake. The FAQ represented his premeditated position on the issue. She is not the deep thinker that they want her to be.
The MP and her staff have been lying about the "FAQ", pushing an absurd story instead of pretending to have been victims of a misinformation campaign from the right. The Ocasio-Cortez teams finally admitted to writing the "FAQ", but only after confusing the case with a false claim that another person created falsified versions of his bill.
As if that were not enough, newsrooms like The New York Times actually help Ocasio-Cortez to deny the lie that his office did not want to write and distribute the ridiculous "FAQ." What is so annoying about the Times that simply accepts The Congress member's version of events is that one must ignore that his staff gave newsrooms now the infamous reading materials "cow farts".
National Public Radio was the first media outlet to give a detailed account of the contents of the Green New Deal proposal. In her exclusive report titled "Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez publishes the Green New Deal Outline", a passage reads as follows:
In addition, the framework, as described in the legislation, as well as a
blog article containing an updated version of & # 39;
Frequently Asked Questions at the Ocasio-Cortez Office at NPR – Call for the Achievement of Other Ambitious Goals …
The link included in the passage above brings readers back to the "FAQ" that the Times claims to have been published "by mistake" Do not just hate yourself when you publish things by mistake on your own website and distribute documents to newsrooms?
A senseless press is a terrible thing. With regard to the insane press, nothing encourages as much as uncomfortable questions about the democratic legislators.
[ad_2]
Source link