[ad_1]
Getty Images
The idea is not new, but it is the emergence of a formal concept in collective bargaining.
Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street newspaper reports that, as part of the NFL's efforts for 18 regular season games, the league has advanced the possibility of a season of 18 games with a limit per player of 16 games per year.
This idea has been spreading for years; this has been the subject of several stories of PFT, PFT Live #PFTPM discussions and monologues.
Most recently, the topic was discussed in an interview with Hall of Fame head coach Tony Dungy last month, whose video is attached to the text (the question is asked at 9:37).
The next day, coach Dungy called after the show another important observation: some fans will revolt against an 18/16 approach. For example, this year, the Browns play in Arizona during the 15th week; This is Cleveland's first visit to the desert, once every eight years. Brown fans in Phoenix who want (and have paid) to see Baker Mayfield, Odell Beckham and Jarvis Landry play would be upset if they learned 90 minutes before the kickoff one or more of them are in good shape. health, but do not play.
With respect to Mayfield and all other quarters, the problem could be resolved by an exception for this position, given the enhanced security rules applicable to them. (Kickers, punters, holders and long-range players would receive / should receive similar treatment.) The NFL nonetheless has many stars who are not quarterbacks, and many fans would be angry if they get presented to hope for a match. see a star player who does not play because it's one of the two games he will not play.
The fact that the NFL even suggests such a revolutionary concept, which has unintended consequences, shows how desperate the league is to expand the regular season – and how effectively the NFL Players Association has repelled these efforts. At this point, the league can get 18 games only by offering players a financial offer they can not refuse.
[ad_2]
Source link