[ad_1]
When the Pac-12 Commissioner, Larry Scott (see above), announced the start of the conference games by noon, Eastern Time (10 am, 9 am Pacific), to Provided that the move is made as quickly as possible. year. That would be Fox's new focus on the Noon Eastern window, which they use for their new pre-game show "Big Noon Kickoff". Well, according to Jon Wilner of The San Jose Mercury NewsThere will be no Pac-12 games in this window this season, but the conference has not moved away from the idea. Here is more of Wilner on this subject:
Andrew Walker, head of communications for the Pac-12, said several schools wanted to play early, but the conference could not find "good options" over the next three months.
Walker added that the plan is to watch the Big 12 and Big Ten games in the 9-hour window and then re-evaluate them for next season.
By delaying at least the first launches of at least 2020, the Pac-12 will leave schools and fans time to plan unusual logistics.
There was a lot of negative feedback from fans about this idea when it came up. That's why not doing it this season is at least a partial victory. And it makes sense that it was hard to find places to do it so close to the start of the season. As Walker notes, it also allows the Pac-12 to see what's going on with the games from other conferences that will be airing at this window this season. But it seems that some schools of Pac-12 are planning to continue in this direction, but not this season.
And if Pac-12 schools accept that, the games will be terribly early. Eight of the 12 conference schools (Washington, DC, Oregon, Cal, Stanford, USC, and UCLA) are in the Pacific time zone, and Arizona's decision not to use the Advanced Daylight Savings Time means that even if it is in the time zone of the Mountain Time, Arizona and Arizona State are at GMT-7 (equivalent of Pacific Time) until early November. Colorado and Utah are the two Pac-12 member schools that spend the whole year at Mountain Time, but an ET midday game would still be a kickoff for 10 hours. As Sam Cooper wrote to Yahoo at the announcement last month, some coaches have already voiced their concerns about the proposed early starts, including David Shaw of Stanford:
A coach, David Shaw of Stanford, was asked about the proposal. He is not on board.
"A kickoff of 9 hours for us means you wake up your players at 6 am. This is not necessarily a positive thing to do, "Shaw said. "With all the studies we've all read and conducted ourselves on our own campus, our sleep studies, it's best for kids to get athletic when they have a good night's sleep." And I do not know if you can find a group of young people aged 18 to 22 who will go to bed at 10 o'clock in the evening and get up at 6 in the morning to perform sports. "
Although he "pushes back" at 9 am, Shaw said that starting games at "11am, 11:30 or noon" would be "great".
However, this view is not universal, with UCLA's Chip Kelly mentioning in this article that he prefers early rather than late-night departures (something Pac-12 coaches and administrators have long complained about) . But early starts certainly pose challenges to both players and fans, and it's unclear how much the Pac-12 will actually benefit; maybe they will draw more attention from national television on these games than they would if these games were played against strong competition, but part of the problem is that it is n & rsquo; Is not much time, it is the current state of interest of the product of the Pac-12. . We will see if they end up with the kickoff of noon in the east of the country and, if so, how it suits them.
[[[[The San Jose Mercury News]
[ad_2]
Source link