The Senate confirms Wendy Vitter, candidate for the judiciary who refused to say if "Brown v Board of Education" was correctly decided



[ad_1]

Vitter – who is the attorney general of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans – was confirmed for life by a vote at 52-45.

Senator Richard Blumenthal asked Vitter last year at a confirmation hearing before the Judiciary Committee of the Senate, whether she thought Brown v. Board of Education – The historical opinion of 1954 that invalidated school segregation and the doctrine "separate but equal" – was properly decided.

Trump's judicial candidate refuses to say whether a historic opinion on civil rights has been properly decided

Vitter, in this exchange, would not answer the senator's question.

"I do not want to be shy," she said, "but I think I can get into a difficult area when I start commenting on the decisions of the Supreme Court – which are properly rendered and with which I could not I would put my personal, political or religious opinions aside – this is the precedent of the Supreme Court – it is binding, and if I had the honor of being confirmed, I would be bound by it, and of course, I would respect it. "

Asked again by Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, if she thought Brown was "correctly chosen," Vitter again refused to answer her, saying she should not comment on the cases she was with. agree, for fear of engaging on a slippery slope.

In written follow-up questions submitted after the hearing, Vitter expanded on her response by saying, "I do not believe that racial segregation in schools is constitutional" and that she hates racism.

The judicial conservatives argued that Vitter had refused to answer the Brown question, saying that judges should preserve their impartiality by refusing to give personal opinions on particular cases.

[ad_2]

Source link