[ad_1]
The decision to abandon the discussions does not necessarily mean that a final proposal from the administration is imminent. E.P.A. had planned to complete the dismantling proposal by the end of March, but the partial closure of the government early in the year set this goal in May or June, officials said. ;agency.
Automakers, who fear that competing rules will cause chaos in the domestic auto industry, have called for further discussions.
"We continue to believe that there is an interim solution that supports the goals of the government, the state of California and automakers," said John Bozzella, General Manager of Global Automakers, which represents automakers and automakers. parts suppliers with activities in the sector. United States.
"We have always known that running a national program would be a challenge," said Gloria Bergquist, vice president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents the country's largest automakers. But a compromise "is worth trying," she said. "We encourage everyone to continue to focus on how we get there."
The announcement came as relations between Washington and California deteriorated rapidly.
In recent weeks, the Trump administration has announced it will end a $ 929 million federal subsidy for the state's troubled high-speed train project. The transport department said it was considering legal solutions to recover $ 2.5 billion already spent. President Trump has also threatened to cut federal funding for forest fires after the devastating fires that killed 89 people.
Trump also criticized Twitter when 16 states filed lawsuits for deciding to declare a national emergency in order to obtain funding for a border wall. l & # 39; writing that California, "the state that has wasted billions of dollars on its uncontrollable Fast Train, with no hope of completion, seems in charge!"
Lisa Friedman reported from Washington and Hiroko Tabuchi from New York.
For more information on the climate and the environment, follow @NYTClimate on Twitter.
[ad_2]
Source link