Throw-in or corner? Controversy over the Red Bulls' decisive goal against NYCFC



[ad_1]

The New York Red Bulls took a second-half lead over rivals NYCFC in the Hudson Derby on Sunday after a quick heads-up playoff. Sounds simple enough, right?

Think again.

The NYCFC was immediately upset as Danny Royer led his second goal of the game, the goal of the game after equalizing with a penalty late in the first period:

The source of their frustrations? They were convinced that the previous game should have been whistled as a corner kick, rather than the Red Bulls throw-in that led to the goal.

In the previous sequence, NYCFC's Alex Callens, under pressure from a Red Bulls striker deep in his own half, cleared a high clearance off the pitch, and Corey Rockwell's close assistant seemed to give the kick to the corner. However, the Red Bulls quickly took the lead, NYCFC appearing to be ready for a corner, and scored two assists later.

Despite the furious protests of visitors, referee Alan Kelly has maintained the goal. FS1 broadcaster JP Dellacamera said later in the match that he had been informed that Kelly had canceled Rockwell's call from Corner, turning it into a touch.

UPDATE: After the match, the referee team confirmed to the designated pool reporter that Kelly had canceled the assistant referee's appeal because he "was better placed to judge the ball's throw-in" and that he was "in a good position". he "verbally indicated that the restart was a throw-in."

[ad_2]

Source link