[ad_1]
He promises "significant changes" in his decision-making process as a result of embarrassment.
The cartoon appeared in the opinion section of the International Paper Print Edition, next to a Thomas Friedman chronicle on immigration.
The Times' apology arrived Sunday afternoon after issuing an earlier statement in which it said it was wrong to publish a drawing that contained "anti-Semitic tropes". But this statement contained no excuses.
"We are deeply sorry for the publication of an anti-Semitic political cartoon last Thursday in the New York Times print edition that circulates outside the United States, and we pledge to ensure that nothing of the sort not happen again. "
"Such images are still dangerous, and at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, it's all the more unacceptable," he said.
The newspaper said the decision to run the cartoon subscribed had been taken by a single editor working without adequate supervision.
"The question remains under review and we are evaluating our internal processes and training," the statement said. "We anticipate significant changes."
Critics had said the Times' first statement was inadequate.
"The picture was shocking and it was a misjudgment to publish it. It was provided by the New York Times News Service and Syndicate, which has since removed it," says the initial statement. of the Times, which was revealed in a statement. tweet and said will appear in the print edition of the newspaper on Monday.
"Excuses Not Accepted How many New York Times editors watched a cartoon that would not have seemed out of place on a white supremacist Web site and thinking it was following the editorial standards of the newspaper? does that say about your processes or your decision makers, how are you repairing it? "tweeted the American Jewish Committee.
David Harris, the CEO of AJJ, also condemned the Times and its complete lack of apology.
"No," apology "is not enough. [the New York Times] Should readers explain how this happened? After all, the decision to print it involved more than one person, and what he says about the newspaper's vision of Israel and the Jews, "he wrote in a tweet.
"While # Antisemitism is gaining momentum … synagogues are attacked and Jews killed … a democratic state # Israel is demonized … and Jewish institutions are forced to strengthen security … he said in another.
The cartoon and the initial Kellyanne Conway, a White House advisor, also criticized the lack of apologies during an appearance in "State of the Union" on CNN Sunday.
"This anti-Semitic caricature of which I will not even describe the details because it is so odious and offensive, they do not even apologize," she said. Sunday morning before the Times' second statement. "The excuses usually include words like regret, sorry and apologize – they did not do it." CNN's host, Jake Tapper, endorsed his statement.
"We are talking about normalizing hate speech, the New York Times is only helping out by publishing caricatures and making this sweet and stupid statement of" regret "about it," said Elaina Plott, the reporter's correspondent. The Atlantic used her fingers to indicate quotation marks around the word regret.
She stated that it was important that the Times be much more transparent and publish a detailed statement explaining how the management error of the cartoon was made.
[ad_2]
Source link