Transferring immigrants to "sanctuary cities" is "an option on the table," says the White House press officer

by



[ad_1]

Sanders said that this decision would not be the "first choice" of President Donald Trump, but that it would remain something that the administration could do. She said that when the idea had been raised "at the staff level", the administration had not advanced because "logistically, there were a lot of challenges and it was not probably not logical to go forward, consider again.

"The president has heard this idea, he likes it, so, well, we are looking to see if there are options that make it possible and to conduct a thorough, thorough and thorough review," said Sanders.

Trump confirmed Friday that his government was planning to release immigrants to so-called "sanctuaries", partly to take revenge on the Democrats, thus downplaying the previous denials of his own officials.

The term "shrine city" is a broad term generally used to refer to locations with little co-operation with federal immigration authorities, and many large cities in the country have such policies.

Trump has long protested against "sanctuary" policies and, in response to the most recent information, a spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the Trump administration of "dying". having used human beings – including young children – as pawns in their twisted game perpetuating fear and demonizing immigrants ".

Trump claims Twitter

The words of the White House's chief spokesperson comes one day after Trump claimed on Twitter that "the United States has the legal right to apprehend illegal immigrants transferred to towns in the sanctuary. ".

"We hereby request that they be cared for at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is known for its mismanagement and high taxes!" Trump tweeted.

Trump sought to describe undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers as undesirable and claimed in a tweet Saturday that Oakland, California, Libyan mayor Libby Schaaf and other mayors of "sanctuary towns" do not did not want "our" currently detained immigrants "."

Schaaf told CNN on Friday that the planned project would constitute an "outrageous abuse of power" and told Trump on Saturday that he was mistaken about his position.

"It's time to stop stirring hatred and division @realDonaldTrump – I've been consistent and clear: #Oakland welcomes everyone, no matter where you come from or how did you get here, "she said on Twitter.

Answers Sunday

Several Democrats went on the air on Sunday and reprimanded Trump's gesture.

The Speaker of the Judiciary of the House, Jerry Nadler, Democrat in New York, said in CNN's "State of the Union" that Trump "is not allowed to spend the money. 39, money allocated by Congress for other purposes to ship immigrants all over the country ".

"Nor is it that the president uses immigrants or people who claim political asylum as pawns in the fight against their opponents," Nadler said. "He should not use them as what he imagines to be a revenge to political opponents in various fields."

The Democratic governor of Washington, Jay Inslee, presidential candidate, also criticized Trump for his idea, claiming on "Meet the Press" of the NBC channel that he "acted" on Another act of explosive chaos "and that" it just will not work for this inefficient president ". , for several reasons. "

"The number one, look, you can not threaten someone with something that does not scare them," Inslee said. "And we are not afraid of diversity in the state of Washington, we savor it."

In another Sunday morning interview on CNN, Sen. Rick Scott of the Florida GOP said he did not know if this policy would be legal or not.

"I do not know if it's legal or illegal," Scott said. "I mean, maybe he's just saying that to make everybody crazy, so everyone can talk about it during their shows."

Priscilla Alvarez and Evan Perez of CNN contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link