Trump administration comes close to funding the family planning planner



[ad_1]

Title X, established in 1970, spends more than $ 250 million annually on birth control and other reproductive health services for about 4 million people.

At the center of opponents' concerns about the rule These provisions prohibit health care providers receiving federal funding from performing abortions or even referring patients elsewhere for the procedure.

"This rule intentionally strikes the heart of the patient-provider relationship, inserting a political ideology into a family planning visit, which will frustrate and dissuade patients from seeking the health care they need," said Clare Coleman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the National. Association for Family Planning and Reproductive Health.

"This blatant attack on family planning care could result in substandard or non-existent care for people who are struggling to make ends meet," said Coleman, whose organization represents directors and providers of family planning services funded by the state.

Anti-abortion groups quickly applauded the development, which would have the effect of reducing funding for Planned Parenthood.

"We thank President Trump for taking decisive action to dissociate taxpayers from the abortion sector," said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony List.

"The Protect Life rule does not reduce family planning funding by a single penny, but instead directs taxes to entities that provide health care to women but do not perform abortions," he said. said Dannenfelser in a statement. "The Title X program was not meant to be a slush fund for abortion companies."

Dr. Leana Wen, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, responded on Friday, calling the rule "gag rule" and describing it as "unacceptable and unethical".

"This rule compromises the oath I have vowed to serve patients and help them make the best decision for their own health.Patients expect their doctors to talk to them frankly, that 's what they are doing. they answer their questions, that they help them when needed, "she said in a statement. "Imagine if the Trump administration was preventing doctors from talking about insulin to our diabetic patients.This would never happen.Reproductive health care should not be different."
The Trump administration sues for low-income family planning dollars

The Title X family planning program was established under the Nixon administration to provide family planning services and related health services. But what constitutes "family planning" has become a subject of political discord.

The law prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions. And while Planned Parenthood insists that the Title X funds it receives are used for the many non-abortion-related services provided – including access to birth control, Pap smear, pregnancy and STD screening – Conservatives have long supported Health centers like this one should be totally cut off from federal funding for family planning.

The updates announced on Friday will replace the rules in place since 2000. They will also replace a 2016 rule imposing restrictions on States and other entities receiving Title X funding. Since May, prosecutions have been initiated to try to block most recent changes.

The changes also include increased transparency by requiring more complete reports from those receiving funding. In addition, the program will strengthen efforts to prevent women and children from becoming victims of abuse, sexual abuse, sexual abuse, rape, incest and domestic violence, according to the report. Health and Human Services.

Included are "notable improvements designed to increase the number of patients served and improve the quality of their care," says the agency statement. "The updated rule aims to ensure a holistic and health-centered approach, preserving the short- and long-term family planning needs of more women, men and women. 39, adolescents in need of services. "

The final rule for Title X will come into effect 60 days after its publication in the Federal Register. And while organizations such as the National Association for Family Planning and Reproductive Health treat the rule of more than 300 pages, they also say they are ready to fight and can take legal action.

"If the published official rule is as detrimental as the final version of today," said Ms. Coleman, her group "will be ready to challenge the Trump government to protect the safety net from planning for the millions of people who depend on it.

[ad_2]

Source link