[ad_1]
President Trump on Saturday discovered what he described as a "judge appointed by Obama activist" after a federal judge blocked the administration's plan to reallocate Money to build a wall on the southern border of Mexico.
"Another activist appointed by Obama, a judge has just ruled against us on a section of the South Wall that is already under construction," he said. "It's a judgment against border security and in favor of crime, drugs and human trafficking."
THE JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKED THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS OF TRUMP EDGE WALLS
Trump went on to say that the administration was asking for "an expedited appeal".
The decision of US District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam, temporarily barred the administration from using reallocated funds for two wall-related projects in Arizona and Texas by diverting funds that Congress did not not approved.
Trump declared a national emergency in February and uses this statement to reorient the Pentagon's funding, after Congress has not accepted the president's request for more than $ 5 billion.
"The" absolute "control of the Congress on federal spending – even when this control can counteract the executive's desires with regard to the initiatives that it considers important – is not a bug of our system This is a feature of this system and essential, "wrote Gilliam, a president of former President Barack Obama.
"In summary, the position that, when Congress refuses the executive's request for funding, the executive could simply find a way to spend those funds" without the Congress "does not go along with basic principles of Republic separation of powers," he says.
Gilliam's decision does not prevent the Trump administration from using other sources to finance the wall, and he denied California's and 19 other states' requests to prevent the $ 600 million diversion of funds. from the Treasury to the wall.
REPUBLICAN LAUNCHES NEW PUSH TO DEFEND SANCTUARY CITIES AFTER BLOCK TRUMP TRIBUNALS
Trump's national emergency declaration after a 35-day government shutdown was controversial on both sides of the aisle. A resolution disapproving of the declaration was passed by both houses of Congress, but was opposed to the office of the president. Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, of D-Calif., And Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of DN.Y., have called it "seizure of power by a disappointed president" in a statement.
Congress had accepted $ 1.4 billion for border security, but it was not close to Trump's $ 5 billion.
The White House was considering additional funding of $ 8 billion that could be transferred to the wall, of which $ 3.5 billion could be transferred from the Defense Department 's military construction budget via the emergency declaration.
Trump predicted a difficult legal battle when he declared the national emergency, saying he would end up in the Supreme Court.
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP
"We will have a national emergency and then we will be sued," Trump said, adding that the federal appeals courts might well rule against his administration. "Then we will meet in the Supreme Court, and hope we get a fair shake, and we win at the Supreme Court – just like the [travel] prohibit."
The case is one of many lawsuits filed by the administration about the statement. Thursday, a judge in Washington heard the arguments of the House of Representatives about a lawsuit that claimed that it violated the Constitution.
The judge wondered if the House could sue the Speaker instead of resolving a dispute through the political process.
Louis Casiano, Brooke Singman and the Fox News Associated Press contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link